Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hello linux world,
I am planning to create a linux based application. Actualy to boot the kernel, and then to run the application without any window manager.
How can i sell this full system (linux kernel, application) without the need to provide the source code of my application, or to have any licence isues)?
Thank you!
I understand if i modify the actual kernel to provide the source. But this is applied both to my application? I mean the application i will startup after kernel boot.
Also thank you for your quick responses!
As I understand it it depends what your application is doing, what other software it uses. If you're pulling in GPL code directly, then I believe you need to fully disclose it, but if you're using libraries covered by, for example, LGPL instead, there are lower levels of requirement when you are free to keep the source to yourself. Basically just be aware of what you directly interact with, and what license those elements carry. Merely being ON linux doesn't mean you need to disclose the code, as if that were the case, no major commercial developer would really go near it.
This article is very sandal wearer biased and comes from a different angle, but gives a reasonable picture of some of the issues involved - http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html
Last edited by acid_kewpie; 04-25-2012 at 04:48 AM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.