Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Im using VMware player for fedora. I own a legal version of Windows XP pro, but i dont have any VM (virtual machine image with the file extension .vmx) of it. Is there any way to create such a file of the windows xp pro OS without having to use the vmware workstation version?
Could it work to use the try-out version of vmware, then install windows xp and then use that image in vmare player? I guess it will, but the main question is then will the image always work or will it be unavailble at the end of the trial eventhough im using vmware player instead of vmware workstation?
yes you can. vmware-server IS vmware gsx. you can do anythign on it, it just doesn't scale to enterprise applications. all part of VMwares game plan to lock in small companies when they get big.
you can also install windows over an existing vm, and you can even write your own from scratch in notepad too.. it's really not a difficult thing to do.
YOu can install an OS using any version of VMware. What VMware Player can't do is create new blank virtual machines. But as acid_kewpie said, that's not really a big deal. You can just hop over to a page like this and download a pre-built .vmdk disk image and a template .vmx which you can edit by hand.
All good things considered ... perhaps VMWare, Inc. has surely earned the few dollars that they require? Perhaps it is but a pittance that they ask, if it does for you what they promise (and it does), and thus be it "money well and wisely spent"...?
All good things considered ... perhaps VMWare, Inc. has surely earned the few dollars that they require? Perhaps it is but a pittance that they ask, if it does for you what they promise (and it does), and thus be it "money well and wisely spent"...?
(Commerce.. what a concept.. )
huh? who said anything about ever spending any money? they don't "require" and dollars...
Distribution: Mac OS X Leopard 10.6.2, Windows 2003 Server/Vista/7/XP/2000/NT/98, Ubuntux64, CentOS4.8/5.4
Posts: 2,986
Rep:
If someone had the commercial version of VMware, does this mean they could theoretically create blank images of an OS and distribute it legally for free?
If someone had the commercial version of VMware, does this mean they could theoretically create blank images of an OS and distribute it legally for free?
I believe so. A blank VM is just a text file and an empty disk image. I don't think there's there anything to copyright. The real question is, why would anyone bother?
I also tried to install Windows XP Pro. I used the windows .vmx file and .vmdk file on the site mentioned above and started up with the CD-ROM. I got the same error messages as listed above.
So, what i got working was booting from an ISO file on a CD. Why am i getting these errors? And when specifying which iso to start from when using the windows .vmx file, what should i write here?
Distribution: RHEL 4 and up, CentOS 5.x, Fedora Core 5 and up, Ubuntu 8 and up
Posts: 251
Rep:
VMware Server vs VMplayer
So from your last post you said that VMware Server is nothing like the VMplayer.... is this a good thing or a bad thing?
I browsed through the thread and just thought I would see how you like VMserver so far. I just installed it and am running a few different OS's just to see what the tool is like. So far it is really awesome!
Distribution: Mac OS X Leopard 10.6.2, Windows 2003 Server/Vista/7/XP/2000/NT/98, Ubuntux64, CentOS4.8/5.4
Posts: 2,986
Rep:
I have never used VMplayer so I have no idea what it's like. I use VMware server and it's the best thing that has ever happened in systems and network testing. Before I deploy anything out, I mess around with VMware to see how things will hold up. All I can say is that it has saved my butt on the job so many times because of the neat save/restore image state. It's so fast!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.