LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-06-2009, 02:06 PM   #1
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Distribution: Debian distro family
Posts: 2,373

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
buying a distro from a distributor vs. from creator's website


Partly because I want to be a good citizen and partly because I suspect my distros of being corrupted (due to either bad downloads or bad CD burns), I decided to buy a copy of my distro (MEPIS) instead of downloading and burning. But because I'm a few months away from being laid off, I wanted to save money. So I went to linuxcd.org and bought a CD for a few dollars, thinking it was a good compromise, a halfway point between a free download and buying a package from mepis.org. Do you agree?
 
Old 04-06-2009, 02:10 PM   #2
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 17,809

Rep: Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743
The prices I have seen (on Distrowatch) start at $1.95---How much of that do you think goes to the author/maintainer?

If you download, check the MD5 sum, and burn at reasonable rates, there should be no issue with getting free distros. Then donate directly to the author.
 
Old 04-06-2009, 02:10 PM   #3
mostlyharmless
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Distribution: Arch/Manjaro, might try Slackware again
Posts: 1,851
Blog Entries: 14

Rep: Reputation: 284Reputation: 284Reputation: 284
Quote:
thinking it was a good compromise
Well, for you it was, I suppose, if it was worthwhile to pay money for a CD instead of burning your own. For mepis.org it did them no good at all, unless they get money from linuxcd.org, which I'd bet is unlikely.
 
Old 04-06-2009, 02:11 PM   #4
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
no, not at all. that's only for people who can't download an iso. nothing goes back to the project, only profit to the bloke that burned the cd. There's no "good citizen" angle there at all.
 
Old 04-06-2009, 03:25 PM   #5
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Distribution: Debian distro family
Posts: 2,373

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Okay, so I was wrong. That answers my question. Oh, well, I could still send MEPIS money.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pixellany View Post
The prices I have seen (on Distrowatch) start at $1.95---How much of that do you think goes to the author/maintainer?
I have no idea, but I thought some of it did, because honestly, I supposed that distributors pay the creator for permission to sell copies. If not, why in hell don't they have to?--they should.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pixellany View Post
If you download, check the MD5 sum, and burn at reasonable rates, there should be no issue with getting free distros. Then donate directly to the author.
There might be, because my MEPIS (both 7 and 8) has been awfully buggy and crash-prone for some time (even after reinstallations), and I haven't seen any othert MEPIS users complaining of that. I suspect bad downloads, bad burns or bad CDs, and I wanted to eliminate those possibilities.

Last edited by newbiesforever; 04-06-2009 at 03:35 PM.
 
Old 04-06-2009, 03:26 PM   #6
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
They are being perfectly good citizens, and doing nothing wrong in the slightest.
 
Old 04-06-2009, 03:38 PM   #7
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Distribution: Debian distro family
Posts: 2,373

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
[cough] I see you answered my last post while I was busy editing it, Chris; and I'm supposing you might be annoyed to see that I significantly changed the wording of it. Because I'm a perfectionist writer who almost always edits and re-edits his posts on every website he posts on, you might want to wait a few minutes before responding. My apologies.
 
Old 04-06-2009, 03:49 PM   #8
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
if you check the md5sums you'll know 100% that the file you have is just fine. if it's not, it won't crash occasionally, it just won't install in the first place. That's if it's corrupted. If it's modified by someone else, well that could have other experiences, but that's the point of checking an md5sum.
 
Old 04-06-2009, 03:52 PM   #9
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Distribution: Debian distro family
Posts: 2,373

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
That leaves the possibility of bad CD burns or bad CDs, even though I learned long ago to not burn faster than 4x.
 
Old 04-06-2009, 04:05 PM   #10
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
I've not had a problem in 5 years at least. Reckon you're going wrong somewhere. ;-)
 
Old 04-06-2009, 06:13 PM   #11
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Distribution: Debian distro family
Posts: 2,373

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I expect so. So my CDs are unreliable. So it's safer to buy a pre-burned copy. Quad erat demonstrandum.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
thoughts on buying online vs. buying offline newbiesforever General 8 12-14-2008 01:35 AM
Need good website hosting distro Joey2619 Linux - Distributions 5 12-11-2004 04:53 PM
Buying new distro. Need Help! RHLinuxGUY Linux - Distributions 7 06-18-2004 07:22 AM
Buying a distro, please advise timberwolf Linux - General 9 12-07-2003 02:52 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration