Blogging software released under GPL3 licensing question
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Blogging software released under GPL3 licensing question
I am using GPL3 licensed blogging software, for security reasons and to confuse the enemy, in case someone wants to hack me, I would like to add a link at the bottom of the blog that says "Powered by WordPress", this blog is not a Wordpress but it looks alike.
I would like to add a link at the bottom of the blog that says "Powered by WordPress", this blog is not a Wordpress but it looks alike.
Is this allowed under the GPL3 licensing terms?
I don't know but (since you mentioned security by obscurity) more interestingly
Quote:
Originally Posted by malcarada
for security reasons and to confuse the enemy
could I discover your software anyway by:
- looking for product-specific features or behaviour in the site?
- looking at the source code?
- enumerating paths specific to the product?
- elicit product-specific error messages?
- (in case you're renting a host or space) looking at adjacent hosted sites?
- use a search-engine to scrape your site?
- use a search-engines cache or Archive.org to find previous versions? - find comms or other indications linked to your handle you're thinking of cloaking your web log? ;-p
Unrelated to the security aspect, the WordPress name is owned by AutoMattic and they may have something to say about using their name without permission. If there were a problem with your site - unintentionally even - you could give their trademark a bad name and they could, potentially, come after you.
Also, and IANAL, doesn't the GPL protect the right of the creator to have their own name on the code? Any cracker worth their salt will ignore your writings on the site and head straight for the vulnerabilities in the underlying database or coding.
I am using GPL3 licensed blogging software, for security reasons and to confuse the enemy, in case someone wants to hack me, I would like to add a link at the bottom of the blog that says "Powered by WordPress", this blog is not a Wordpress but it looks alike.
Is this allowed under the GPL3 licensing terms?
Many thanks
Frankly, if a hacker is stupid enough that he can't figure out you aren't really using Wordpress, you don't have to worry about him anyway.
I'm not a lawyer, but generally the GPL is not concerned so much with how you personally use the software, but rather how you distribute it. For example, if you modify some GPLv3 code, but then distribute it as an official, unchanged distribution, you have directly violated the GPLv3:
Quote:
For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to authors of previous versions.
What you want to do here is, I think, more a generic issue of falsely representing someone's work. It would be like putting a "made by Sony" sticker on a VCR you built.
I can just barely believe you are getting hacked whilst running freeBSD. Not one that is targetted that much, except maybe a few big sites that host servers on it.. hmm.. I have to agree, that the powered by ...is not going to buy you much, but as some have said maybe some troubles with W.P. Most browsers allow one to look at source.. with one click, so .. hmm not much advantage I wouldn't think. --gene
OK, I understand, thanks for feedback. As for me, based on what I read, I changed my mind and you can consider this thread closed, I will not be implementing the trick and will keep the footer as it is.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.