Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have come across several (probably 3 or 4 once I get consolidate all of the parts) older (P3 and below) PCs. I'm getting the hang of running linux on a single PC, but what are some possible uses that I could put these machines to on my personal network?
P3 machines are good for use as a thin client dumb x terminal, if you want to have an extra work station.
Faster P3 machines are good for playing non-HD resolution videos.
One use I like is to have a file server plus one or two spare computers which can be swapped in as a replacement file server. However, these older computers will restrict you to using PATA hard drives.
Depends on the software used. Some packages are pretty straight forward.
Fair warning though, older machines aren't terribly good in clusters. The inherent inefficiency of the setup combined with their relatively low computing power means that the entire cluster is likely not to be any more powerful than even a ~1.5 GHz computer; which can now be had for cheap (and is considerably less complex to run).
Depends on the software used. Some packages are pretty straight forward.
Fair warning though, older machines aren't terribly good in clusters. The inherent inefficiency of the setup combined with their relatively low computing power means that the entire cluster is likely not to be any more powerful than even a ~1.5 GHz computer; which can now be had for cheap (and is considerably less complex to run).
Thanks for the tip, I'll probably just set them up as standalone machines for now and see where that takes me. Maybe I can gain a few linux converts by lending them out to some friends =)
Test machines is good, but if you want to practice as if you had a large (prod LAN) network, make each one a separate server eg 1=Apache, 2=MySQL, 3=Sendmail etc, than make them all work as an integrated set.
Don't forget to customise firewall on each one, then test for integration/security holes
Have fun
I'd go with chrism01's idea. A fairly sizable network is always fun to play with. At times i find myself in need of machines to run dry tests or even better to run honeypots. But its entirely up to you. Go have fun.:smile:
I'd go with chrism01's idea. A fairly sizable network is always fun to play with. At times i find myself in need of machines to run dry tests or even better to run honeypots. But its entirely up to you. Go have fun.:smilie:
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.