[SOLVED] Best filesystem for joint drive between windows-linux
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Best filesystem for joint drive between windows-linux
Hello,
I have a dual boot setup on my computer, having Windows 10 and openSuse. I have a data drive that I use to store my personal data, downloads, pictures, movies, etc. Currently this drive is using NTFS and is extremely slow in Linux. Downloads are very slow on that drive, and running movies and such is also slow. I also tried to run some virtual machines off it and they never even gotten to the boot screen as slow as they were running.
So what would be a good filesystem for a joint drive, linux and windows?
Thank you
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
I'm not sure ther is an answer beyond NTFS. fAT32 has a file-size limit of around 3.4GB, exfat may be better but it's still a FAT file system so no permissions or other extended attributes under either FS.
I am very surprised, though, that you say playing movies and downloading is slow -- the overhead of NTFS should not be thqat bad -- is this an old PC?
You could, for example, download to your Linux file system then move to the NTFS afterwards, and the like?
I think there may be another issue at play here. I use an NTFS data partition on my hard drive for both Linux and Windows and have experienced no performance issues with it. I also plug in an NTFS external hard drive with, again, no noticeable performance issues (although I don't run movies from this latter).
Is the data drive USB3? Is it plugged into a USB3 port?
Well, you guys know more about this than I do but I suspect it's because the NTFS-3G driver is not properly optimised. Being an open-source implementation of an proprietary closed source.
Quote:
I think there may be another issue at play here. I use an NTFS data partition on my hard drive for both Linux and Windows and have experienced no performance issues with it. I also plug in an NTFS external hard drive with, again, no noticeable performance issues (although I don't run movies from this latter).
Is the data drive USB3? Is it plugged into a USB3 port?
No, it is an internal drive. WD Black 7200RPM that works flawlessly in windows but it's slow in linux. Also checked SMART values, there is nothing wrong with the device.
Quote:
I'm not sure ther is an answer beyond NTFS. fAT32 has a file-size limit of around 3.4GB, exfat may be better but it's still a FAT file system so no permissions or other extended attributes under either FS.
I am very surprised, though, that you say playing movies and downloading is slow -- the overhead of NTFS should not be thqat bad -- is this an old PC?
You could, for example, download to your Linux file system then move to the NTFS afterwards, and the like?
No, it's a powerhorse. i7 4770K 4.4Ghz, 32GB RAM, GTX 970. I have a gigabit internet connection so right now it works at half speed that what it usually would've ran on windows.
Quote:
it depends on the size too. Probably fat32 is faster, but you ought to create a backup too.
I couldn't do that. This drive has some video files, tuorials and such that go beyond 3GB.
NTFS. Windows cannot read Linux formats by default, unless something has changed drastically very recently. A web search will turn up some utilities that promise to make Windows capable of reading Linux file formats, but I've never tested them and have no interest in them.
I have encountered no issues with accessing NTFS-formatted partitions with Linux. I have multiple USB external drives with NTFS partitions that work just fine with Linux.
Defragmentation (using the Windows stock defrag utility) might be worth trying too... Its usefulness is often questioned but it's easy to do, it only requires time. Just my 2cents.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.