Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have a laptop with a 600mhz CPU and 96mb of RAM and a RAGE Mobility AGP 2X video card.
Given these reasonably limited resources, I am trying to decide on the best distribution and windowing system to run in order to get the best performance.
I am currently running red hat 9 with kde 3, but this combo is out performed by w2k, a travesty i know.
Can you suggest a configuration (distro, gui, anything else) that will run smoothly?
That's not that bad really. You could stick with your current distro, just drop back to a different window manager:
windowmaker
OpenBox
FluxBox
BlackBox
TWM ( )
XFCE
SawFish
Any of those should run amazingly faster. If you really wanna switch distros, Look at something lighter. If you are fairly confident with Linux, maybe Debian, Slackware, or ArchLinux will be worth looking into.
Thanks for your reply. I take it by the smily face that you recommend twm, if this is correct, can you tell me why? Is there any doco on how to remove kde and install twm without affecting anything else?
im having some problems with the power standby and the network support under red hat, so i am going to give another distro a spin. Are there any major speed differences between distros? ie does turbo linux live up to its name?
Never using Turbo Linux, I cannot comment, however, yes, some distros are, out of the box, faster. But any distro can be tweaked to perform better than another, it's all in the user.
And no, I don't recommend TWM, that was more of a "huh huh, not really" smiley TWM is the most basic windowmanager there is. I believe it's put out by XFree86. It's T=The W=Window M=Manager. And really, that's it. Very basic. Not user friendly really, but hey, it works if you wanna use it.
Red Hat has a NEtwork Administration Tool or neat for short. You can access from KDE of GNOME menu or just type
neat
in a terminal window
There you can find what services you have running at startup. Turn off the ones you know you don't need. It will make your machine run much better.
I have downloaded and installed FVWM. I have set my DISPLAY var to :0.0. When i attempt to run fvwm, it says X must be running, so i start X with startx. X launches, but starts KDE.
I can now run fvwm, but KDE is still running, which negates my whole reason for installing fvwm. Is there any way i can run X, but not have KDE start up?
Am i missing something here? does KDE have to be running? im kinda confused about the window maker / desktop distinction
Originally posted by unSpawn however, yes, some distros are, out of the box, faster.
Show me some stats, C.
I should eventually build something I guess...
I've seen dramatic increases in several areas of my system when switching from Mandrake to Slackware, dead stock. Also seen a bit of speed increase when using a dead stock LFS compared to even Slackware. I can just say "I've seen" because I didn't/don't run benchmarks on my systems. But it was definitely noticeable Applications would load faster, the cursor would blink as if system resources were 'low' on Mandrake, however even in KDE on slack, it would run smoothly. I blame over half the lack of performance on 'services' but regardless, they were there OOB (out of box) and weren't there OOB on slack
hehe, just reading through this post, I have somewhere on this forum seen TWM described as "pure, unadulterated X - with a terminal to run things from". I think that is indeed an apt description. As for some distros being faster, I must say that I have noticed a performance difference between my laptop running Slack, and my laptop running Debian. However, that's probably more to do with the initial configuration [slackware loads minimal services] than the actual distro.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.