LinuxQuestions.org - benchmark Glxgears

- Linux - General (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/)

- - benchmark Glxgears (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/benchmark-glxgears-846531/)

benchmark Glxgears

I want to compare glxgears graphics benchmarks whit other computers.

Code:

~]$ lspci

02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation C77 [GeForce 8200] (rev a2)

Code:

~]$ uname -a

Linux ***** 2.6.35.6-48.fc14.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 22 15:36:08 UTC 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

nvidia-settings @ kmod-nvidia

Code:

Nvidia Driver Version: 260.19.12

Code:

~]$ glxgears -info

GL_RENDERER  = GeForce 8200/PCI/SSE2

GL_VERSION    = 3.3.0 NVIDIA 260.19.12

GL_VENDOR    = NVIDIA Corporation

Code:

~]$ glxgears -fullscreen

478 frames in 5.0 seconds = 95.280 FPS

503 frames in 5.0 seconds = 100.420 FPS

711 frames in 5.0 seconds = 142.151 FPS

953 frames in 5.0 seconds = 190.538 FPS

839 frames in 5.0 seconds = 167.792 FPS

995 frames in 5.0 seconds = 198.782 FPS

980 frames in 5.0 seconds = 195.855 FPS

981 frames in 5.0 seconds = 196.067 FPS

925 frames in 5.0 seconds = 184.846 FPS

951 frames in 5.0 seconds = 190.024 FPS



~]$ glxgears

426 frames in 5.0 seconds = 84.679 FPS

107 frames in 5.0 seconds = 21.304 FPS

87 frames in 5.1 seconds = 17.218 FPS

80 frames in 5.1 seconds = 15.822 FPS

79 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15.732 FPS

80 frames in 5.1 seconds = 15.828 FPS

83 frames in 5.0 seconds = 16.452 FPS

80 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15.891 FPS

80 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15.934 FPS

80 frames in 5.1 seconds = 15.829 FPS

79 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15.771 FPS

79 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15.660 FPS

80 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15.942 FPS

84 frames in 5.0 seconds = 16.661 FPS

81 frames in 5.0 seconds = 16.096 FPS

80 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15.848 FPS

80 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15.958 FPS

88 frames in 5.0 seconds = 17.549 FPS

102 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20.290 FPS

103 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20.479 FPS

104 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20.631 FPS

101 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20.160 FPS

101 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20.139 FPS

103 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20.448 FPS

101 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20.107 FPS

104 frames in 5.0 seconds = 20.673 FPS

Code:

~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo

processor      : 0

vendor_id      : AuthenticAMD

cpu family      : 15

model          : 67

model name      : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6400+

stepping        : 3

cpu MHz        : 3200.055

cache size      : 1024 KB

******************

processor      : 1

vendor_id      : AuthenticAMD

cpu family      : 15

model          : 67

model name      : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6400+

stepping        : 3

cpu MHz        : 3200.055

cache size      : 1024 KB

Code:

~]$ cat /proc/meminfo

MemTotal:        7935908 kB

MemFree:        3857084 kB

Buffers:          105660 kB

Cached:          1825208 kB

SwapCached:            0 kB

Code:

GeForce 8200

cuda cores: 8

grapics clock : 500 Mhz

memory clock : 666 Mhz

processor clock : 1200 Mhz

# lspci | grep -i vga && uname -a && nvidia-settings --glxinfo | grep OpenGL | grep string && cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -i model && cat /proc/meminfo | grep -i mem

01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation Quadro NVS 320M (rev a1)

Linux hp 2.6.35-gentoo-r5 #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Sep 9 20:03:42 CEST 2010 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
OpenGL renderer string: Quadro NVS 320M/PCI/SSE2
OpenGL version string: 3.2.0 NVIDIA 195.36.31

model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz

MemTotal: 2023708 kB
MemFree: 678412 kB
Shmem: 852 kB

$ glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
44314 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8862.195 FPS
44422 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8884.298 FPS
44430 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8885.896 FPS

$ glxgears -fullscreen
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
6855 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1370.822 FPS
6927 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1385.397 FPS
6929 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1385.790 FPS

Remember that glxgears is NOT a benchmark, I've seen values vary widely. I recommend benchmarking with cube or quake engines.

As long as I'm here:

Code:

bash-4.1$ glxgears

83109 frames in 5.0 seconds = 16621.725 FPS

83181 frames in 5.0 seconds = 16636.131 FPS

83599 frames in 5.0 seconds = 16719.666 FPS

83532 frames in 5.0 seconds = 16706.336 FPS

83337 frames in 5.0 seconds = 16667.238 FPS

83201 frames in 5.0 seconds = 16640.152 FPS

bash-4.1$ glxgears -fullscreen

9535 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1906.871 FPS

9536 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1907.093 FPS

9540 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1907.888 FPS



OpenGL renderer string: GeForce 8800 GTS 512/PCI/SSE2

OpenGL version string: 3.3.0 NVIDIA 256.53



Linux greatdemonslayer 2.6.35.7 #4 SMP Sat Oct 2 17:46:22 EEST 2010 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad  CPU  Q9300  @ 2.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

Here are some better benchmarks:
http://unigine.com/products/heaven/
http://www.dee.cz/lightsmark/

Here are my results:

Code:

./x64_1024x768_windowed_tess_normal.sh

Benchmark finished

Time:    319.354

Frames:    12789

FPS:    40.0465

Min FPS:    21.3583

Max FPS:    114.958

Scores:    1008.77

Unigine~# quit

Close "libopenal.so.1"

Close "libGL.so.1"

Memory usage: 128b

Allocations:  1

Shutdown



Unigine

Heaven Benchmark v2.1

FPS:    

40.0

Scores:    

1009

Min FPS:    

21.4

Max FPS:    

115.0

Hardware

Binary:    

Linux 64bit GCC 4.3.2 Release May 20 2010

Operating system:    

Linux 2.6.35.7 x86_64

CPU model:    

Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9300 @ 2.50GHz

CPU flags:    

2499MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 HTT

GPU model:    

GeForce 8800 GTS 512 PCI Express 256.53 512Mb

Settings

Render:    

opengl

Mode:    

1024x768 windowed

Shaders:    

high

Textures:    

high

Filter:    

trilinear

Anisotropy:    

16x

Occlusion:    

enabled

Refraction:    

enabled

Volumetric:    

enabled

Replication:    disabled

Tessellation:    disabled

EDIT:
lightsmark crashes my computer, but before the crash I was getting 1000+ fps.

My system is very busy right now so it is running slower than usual.

30282 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6056.324 FPS
30778 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6155.542 FPS
31174 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6234.639 FPS
31291 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6258.186 FPS
31570 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6313.906 FPS
31739 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6347.723 FPS

Phenom-II 955 overclocked to 3.415 GHz and nvidia GT240 video card.

Ah, come on jiml8 - what a weeeeak excuse ;)
I started glxgears while drinking a beer - does it count? :)
Greetings from freeeeezing Switzerland

# lspci | grep -i vga && uname -a && nvidia-settings --glxinfo | grep OpenGL | grep string && cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -i model && cat /proc/meminfo | grep -i mem 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G72 [GeForce 7300 LE] (rev a1)
Linux megasrv 2.6.35-gentoo-r7 #3 SMP Sat Nov 6 14:38:06 CET 2010 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
OpenGL renderer string: GeForce 7300 LE/PCI/SSE2
OpenGL version string: 2.1.2 NVIDIA 195.36.24
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
MemTotal: 4053000 kB
MemFree: 2198992 kB
Shmem: 4920 kB

# glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
7421 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1484.193 FPS
7412 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1482.376 FPS
7412 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1482.387 FPS

glxgears -fullscreen
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
1089 frames in 5.0 seconds = 217.686 FPS
1087 frames in 5.0 seconds = 217.344 FPS
1089 frames in 5.0 seconds = 217.721 FPS