Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
10-23-2005, 03:12 AM
|
#16
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2004
Distribution: deb lenny 2.6.21-amd64
Posts: 320
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Excuse my ignorance, but I am under the impression initrd is not required.
Kernel 2.6.8, which I compiled from source, has an initrd file but 2.6.13.1 does not, which I installed via apt-get.
I could try adding the path to initrd for 2.6.8 and see if it works. Now that I have a basic understanding of what exactly initrd's function is, I can see that it has a possibility of fixing the long-standing problem.
edit: It turns out I saved myself the hassle of a reboot, as kernel 2.6.8 already has the path to initrd specified and it doesn't work any better than .13 does.
I appreciate your suggestion though.
Last edited by verbose; 10-23-2005 at 03:18 AM.
|
|
|
10-23-2005, 08:18 PM
|
#17
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Camelot
Distribution: cent, RH core, slax, slackware... *buntu...
Posts: 28
Rep:
|
How old is my 600x?
I think IBM made them in late 1999.
Full specs on it:
*500mhz p3
*NeoMagic 4mb video card
*Cirrus Crystal sound
*128ram, which was an upgrade from the regular 64mb.
*12gb HD.
*13.1 inch TFT
*USB
*Modem rj-11
*warm-swappable cdrom/floppy
*it looks like scsi out/in on the back of the machine, which i think is actually the docking station.
*Ir transmit and recieve
*s-video out
*11pin? video out
*old 32pin? printer port
it works decent, a hell of a lot better than m$ would ever run on it.'
making the 2.6.13 kernel from scratch took about 35 minutes
|
|
|
10-24-2005, 01:03 AM
|
#18
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2004
Distribution: deb lenny 2.6.21-amd64
Posts: 320
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Could someone please check to see what the upper and lower extremes are for the block device cdrom? I've been searching around and I keep seeing the values '3, 64' but this is for hdb and not cdrom.
Here's an example...
brw-rw---- 1 root cdrom 22, 0 2005-02-26 01:38 hdc
Since cdrom was once linked to hdc, can I just use '22, 0' for mknod to recreate cdrom? Also, I'm assuming the gid for cdrom should be cdrom rather than root, just like it is for hdc.
#mknod /dev/cdrom b 22 0
#mount /dev/cdrom
>mount: you must specify the filesystem type
# mount /dev/hdc
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc,
> missing codepage or other error
> (could this be the IDE device where you in fact use
> ide-scsi so that sr0 or sda or so is needed?)
> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
> dmesg | tail or so
Last edited by verbose; 10-24-2005 at 01:07 AM.
|
|
|
10-26-2005, 03:44 PM
|
#19
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2004
Distribution: deb lenny 2.6.21-amd64
Posts: 320
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Bump. You guys were doing an excellent job.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|