Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi,
I am about to install Linux (i have not decided on the distro yet) on a new computer.
Here's my question:
Few year ago, i tried a 64 bit distro and had problems with flash not supported and a few other little annoyances. I just wonder if all these little annoyances have been fixed by now, especially video and audio codecs.
Should i go for the 64 bit, will i gain from it?
Thanks for your opinions.
Distribution: fedora 11, Mandriva, RHEL 5, Linux Mint
Posts: 2
Rep:
Hi Davno,
I've been running 64bit versions of various distros for a while and not run any issues for a while now. I've run Linux mint, Ubuntu and Fedora. Also tried Mandriva, but I think it's lost a lot of it's polish since the Mandrake days.
In a word, yes. That is, presuming you are running a 64 bit cpu
Take the kernel: a 32 bit kernel has allowances for every dodgy chipset ever built since the last millenium. The 64 bit kernels can use k8-specific enhancements and leave that old crap out. Yes, flash, java, etc are ropier in 64 bit but everyone is working away. I grabbed an 'alpha unsupported' flash download and have never bothered to update it. Java I shoehorned in with a little trouble, but I had an early (bare-bones-type) slamd64. Most things are fine, and 32 bit stuff still runs. I also keep Fedora, simply because they have guys who sort that sort of thing and put it in an rpm, but I live in Slamd. (Reminds me, I'll have to boot it and fix Fedora one of these days - it needs a service).
java and flash work fine on 64-bit (except some flash crashes, but then 32-bit flash is not much more stable). As for codecs, there are enough for you to play say 97-98 % of all videos, but once in a while there's a video with a strange codec, in which case you may want to use a multilib distro or make a 32-bit chroot, and use 32-bit mplayer to play it, but this is very rare.
Distribution: Fedora, Gentoo, Debian, Slackware, IRIX, OS X
Posts: 192
Rep:
Been running 64-bit Linux for 2 years now without troubles. Adobe has a (alpha) 64bit flash client available, everything else runs just fine. (OR you can use nspluginwrapper to run the 32bit flash.)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.