LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-24-2007, 11:40 PM   #1
the_gripmaster
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: VIC, Australia
Distribution: RHEL, CentOS, Ubuntu Server, Ubuntu
Posts: 364

Rep: Reputation: 38
Lightbulb 32bit or 64bit distro?


I have been reading about 32bit and 64bit versions of Linux. Although 64bit has various issues regarding compatibility, would you opt to go for 64bit (provided you have a AMD64 or Intel 64 processor or any other 64bit processor)?
 
Old 02-25-2007, 12:54 AM   #2
rickh
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250

Rep: Reputation: 62
Right now, your primary concern is the situation with proprietary codecs.

I have a 32-bit / 64-bit dual boot on my desktop, and 32-bit on my laptop. I use the 64-bit about 90% of the time. There are occasions when I really want to see a Flash9 video, or video that requires the w32codes, but for me, those times are fairly infrequent. My kids, on the other hand use the 32-bit OS exclusively for those reasons.

64-bit OSes will soon be the norm, and since Vista is optimized for 64-bit, I think the necessary plugins will soon be available. 64-bit does have advantages, especially in the hardware driver areas, but the actual processing speed improvement is pretty much invisible to the average user.

For Java apps, you can use Konqueror, which doesn't need a java plugin, and the FOSS Flashplayer, Gnash, works fine for older Flash movies. I can't honestly say there is an advantage to using the 64-bit OS, but since it doesn't inhibit my normal usage, I prefer to use it while watching it mature.
 
Old 02-25-2007, 02:11 AM   #3
weibullguy
ReliaFree Maintainer
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, Michigan
Distribution: Slackware 14.2
Posts: 2,815
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 261Reputation: 261Reputation: 261
It depends on what you use the machine for. If it's for general purpose use (e.g., browsing, e-mail, word processing, etc.) you're not going to notice a difference between 32 and 64-bits. There will be one, but the difference in time is measured in nanoseconds. You won't be doing anything intensive enough on a general purpose machine that these few nanoseconds will register in your brain.

On the other hand, if you are using the machine for calculation intensive applications such as serious graphical design, video editing, research, etc. there are enough calculations being performed that they'll add up and you'll notice a difference. For example, I simulate repairable system behavior over long periods (10-20 years). The simulations usually take a "snapshot" of the simulated system every hour or half-hour. There can be 20-million calculations or more performed in a single simulation. Moving from 32-bit to 64-bit cut about 10-12 hours (yes, hours) from the average simulation. That's noticeable.

The only real advantage I see to a 32-bit OS is the plugin and some multimedia support. However, if this is important I would (and do) use a multilib distro. This way you can use both 32-bit and 64-bit applications and, no, you don't need a chroot jail to do this. The libraries will happily coexist and you don't need a complete set of 32-bit libraries only those needed for your 32-bit applications. Eventually you won't need any 32-bit libraries.
 
Old 02-25-2007, 08:51 AM   #4
the_gripmaster
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: VIC, Australia
Distribution: RHEL, CentOS, Ubuntu Server, Ubuntu
Posts: 364

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arow
For example, I simulate repairable system behavior over long periods (10-20 years). The simulations usually take a "snapshot" of the simulated system every hour or half-hour. There can be 20-million calculations or more performed in a single simulation. Moving from 32-bit to 64-bit cut about 10-12 hours (yes, hours) from the average simulation. That's noticeable.
Yup, that certainly is noticeable. I think I will stick with 32 bit as all I am trying to do with Linux is using it as a Windows XP alternative and developing PHP/MySQL applications.
 
Old 02-25-2007, 11:19 PM   #5
the_gripmaster
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: VIC, Australia
Distribution: RHEL, CentOS, Ubuntu Server, Ubuntu
Posts: 364

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 38
BTW, do you think a boost can be achieved in a heavy use of Gimp with a 64bit Linux distro?

Last edited by the_gripmaster; 02-25-2007 at 11:33 PM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can I use to go from 32bit to 64bit? shame Linux - Distributions 6 11-03-2006 06:24 PM
can 64bit processor run both 64bit and 32bit computers? DJOtaku Linux - General 4 09-08-2005 08:14 PM
64bit or 32bit ginger.fish0 Ubuntu 3 09-01-2005 05:12 PM
32bit software on 64bit distro? kahn Linux - Software 1 06-26-2005 07:37 AM
32Bit or 64Bit? bchivers Mandriva 9 05-22-2005 12:28 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration