LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-03-2001, 01:46 PM   #1
Stephanie
LQ Addict
 
Registered: May 2001
Location: Arizona
Distribution: 9.2 Mandy 1.4 Gentoo 5.1 FreeBSD WinXP
Posts: 1,166

Rep: Reputation: 45
2.4 And 2.217 Kernels


So I have MDK 8.0 running kernel 2.4.2, and I wanted to test a theory I had about my configuration.

I downloaded and configured a 2.2.17 kernel, and when I rebooted, it gave the infamous Linux Screen Of Death:
Kernel panic: Unable to mount root partition

Now I checked eeverything, but then I had a thought, and I need someone to verify it. The 2.2.17 series supported ReiserFS, but at a lower version number. As a result, since my root partition is formated as the newer Reiser FS, the older kernel cannot mount it. Does this sound right?
 
Old 07-03-2001, 07:06 PM   #2
CragStar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2000
Location: UK - Frome
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 1,081

Rep: Reputation: 47
You would have thought that they would could have back compatability wouldn't you? But it does sound like that to me.

Don't take my word for it though.
 
Old 07-03-2001, 08:26 PM   #3
GonzoJohn
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Louisville, KY USA
Distribution: RedHat and Debian
Posts: 89

Rep: Reputation: 15
Why 2.2.17 when 2.2.19 is the latest 2.2.x kernel? I think 2.2.20 might even be available. Did the kernel configuration have options for ReiserFS? I always use "make xconfig" to browse all my kernel options in a GUI.
 
Old 07-04-2001, 06:27 AM   #4
cinnix
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Northern Ohio
Distribution: RedHat, Engarde and LFS
Posts: 237

Rep: Reputation: 30
reiserfs was supported natively in the kernel starting at 2.4.1pre10. Before that the kernel had to patched in order to have support.

BTW I would consider an upgrade to your 2.4.2 kernel. 2.4.3 and possibly some future releases had fixes in it that had to do directly with reiserfs
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
10.1 - Kernels? Alan Lakin Slackware 3 02-09-2005 09:28 AM
different kernels master Slackware 8 09-27-2004 04:27 PM
4 different kernels? ampex189 Linux - General 4 03-26-2004 03:16 AM
RH 8 kernels and their relation to 'stock' kernels psweetma Linux - Distributions 1 03-29-2003 11:46 PM
kernels watashiwaotaku7 General 2 12-26-2002 09:42 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration