LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software > Linux - Games
User Name
Password
Linux - Games This forum is for all discussion relating to gaming in Linux.

Notices


View Poll Results: Should gaming companies make their games compatible with Linux (finally)?
Yes, 72 94.74%
No, 4 5.26%
Voters: 76. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-05-2007, 10:11 AM   #16
alred
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: singapore
Distribution: puppy and Ubuntu and ... erh ... redhat(sort of) :( ... + the venerable bsd and solaris ^_^
Posts: 658
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 31

easy ...

all linux games(or windows games written for linux) must not be freely downloadable ... not even "crippled" and "short demos" ones(probably some windows games are like that) but introductory "previews" are ok(like watching good short movies) ... you have to make and advertise them , let them stand out like diablo and counter-strike as these two are the only one that i know(not only heard of) and therefore i bought for my kids back then ...

ofcause ... parents who only use linux at homes are the most reliable ...

but probably we may also see more people start "conventionally" selling(charging) their application softwares or even linux systems ...



.

[edit ::]ok , have finished "updating" a bit of things here and there in my linux(and some more to go) ...

probably my point is linux gamers like you who can(or will) definately purhase linux games even if there are windows(or mac) alternatives are vital for linux ... even more so than linux distros packagers and linux systems and applications developers ...

so ... the more the better ...



.

Last edited by alred; 12-05-2007 at 11:05 AM.
 
Old 12-05-2007, 01:30 PM   #17
Erik765
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Distribution: Kubuntu 7.10, Fedora 8
Posts: 48

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Rogerbennet. I can see and respect that point of view. I guess I've always just taken the viewpoint of Field of Dreams. Remember the famous quote from that movie, "If you build it, they will come"?
In my opinion, people aren't going to move into a town if there aren't any houses available to buy.

I guess, overall, I'm just tired of seeing articles saying "Linux can do whatever Windows and Mac can... well, except for high-end gaming".

And I know it will happen someday, just like it did with Mac. It took a while. I'm just trying to get a feel for the interest level here, and to raise awareness of those willing to pay for houses... er, I mean applications as long as they're made available.

Some good points here guys. Keep it up.
 
Old 12-05-2007, 02:59 PM   #18
teabag_46
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 15
I think one possible solution to getting (mainstream) games onto Linux, would be a simple matter for the game manufacturers. Advertise on any of the Linux forums, asking for programmers to work alongside windows programmers and work on the same game BUT write it for Linux. Once the Linux version is available, then forget about package managers and just sell the game in tar files.
I am sure that there would be plenty of people willing to help produce games for Linux, for no other reward than 'having their name in lights!'
 
Old 12-06-2007, 06:57 AM   #19
alred
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: singapore
Distribution: puppy and Ubuntu and ... erh ... redhat(sort of) :( ... + the venerable bsd and solaris ^_^
Posts: 658
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 31
you have to pay for them as handsomely as how you pay for your windows productions ... as linux guys are notorious in only interested in re/enhancing their vi and their shells ...


//btw ... other than counter strike and diablo i had left out warcraft ...


.
 
Old 12-06-2007, 08:43 AM   #20
Mega Man X
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Solaris, DSL
Posts: 5,339

Rep: Reputation: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik765 View Post
I guess, overall, I'm just tired of seeing articles saying "Linux can do whatever Windows and Mac can... well, except for high-end gaming".

And I know it will happen someday, just like it did with Mac. It took a while.
Since when did Mac got into "mainstream" gaming? It is still horrible, in my honest opinion. Indeed, not as bad as Linux, but far from being any noticeable for serious gamers.

Games for Mac have been around, well, forever. Specially games for children, that you get as a freebie on McDonald's and places like that, even before OSX came out.

And now that you can actually install Windows on the super-overpriced-and-over-hyped Intel/Mac computers, the chances of any developer creating games for Mac will be reduced by some level. They will just stick with Windows and hope that Mac'ers will install Windows on their machines anyway.

There are, however, two things that developers may consider for Mac that they won't in Linux: The Mac-community usually don't mind paying for software (like people complaining about Cedega) and it is far easier to develop for Mac than it is for Linux because it follows a more standardized way of doing things.
 
Old 12-06-2007, 09:55 AM   #21
alred
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: singapore
Distribution: puppy and Ubuntu and ... erh ... redhat(sort of) :( ... + the venerable bsd and solaris ^_^
Posts: 658
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 31
>> "... two things that developers may consider for Mac that they won't in Linux: The Mac-community usually don't mind paying for software (like people complaining about Cedega)"

this can be wrong ... sounds like a "prejudice" to me ... i believe they can even charge higher than windows alternatives for reason that can be commercially valid ...

>> "... it is far easier to develop for Mac than it is for Linux because it follows a more standardized way of doing things."

since linux gamers are going to pay for it then i think probably they dont mind the trouble in meeting the requirements in terms of hardwares and softwares ... infact things can only get better if there are more "windows" games written for linux ...



btw ...

>> "Games for Mac have been around, well, forever. Specially games for children, that you get as a freebie on McDonald's and places like that, even before OSX came out."

if that happen to linux one day then what do you call that ... ?? a miracle ... ^_^



.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 10:40 AM   #22
rogerbennett
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: red hat, Xandros, Puppy.
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: 0
Macs seem to be on the horizon for mainstream gaming, if id softwares Tech 5 demo is anything to go by. Like linux, i'm sure it'll only take a few "killer apps" to be ported and it'll start attracting huge attention.

It'd be very difficult to get a linux community to develop a game alongside a commercial windows version. Out-House programmers earned that nickname for a reason, and without good QA I can't imagine a developer or publisher who'd want anything to do with a linux port. Nor can I imagine a developer or publisher willing to share the source code to their latest game FOR FREE to the world at large - including to their direct competitors in the marketplace.
Plus most programmers willing to do it "just to get their name in lights" are going to struggle in the games industry, where many programmers - and indeed developers in general can be the unsung heroes - people with the wrong/shallow motivations are going to get easily demotivated.

The idea of developing a game in tandem with a community is good in theory, but a lack of ownership implies a lack of royalties which makes commercial games development very difficult indeed. Free sequels and alternatives could very quickly flood the market.

Community development of games might work if you scale up the workforce massively, and can keep the development organized, but we are talking about needing hundreds of developers all sharing a common goal to get a project completed in a timely fashion. It'd be an interesting project to be a part of, but I suspect the future of linux gaming lies in traditional games developers and publishers filling a market that can only be created by linux users buying lots of games.
 
Old 12-08-2007, 05:48 AM   #23
alred
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: singapore
Distribution: puppy and Ubuntu and ... erh ... redhat(sort of) :( ... + the venerable bsd and solaris ^_^
Posts: 658
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 31
is it possible to do commercial linux games like how people are writing windows games ... ?? "strict" ownerships(implying royalties ??) of linux games by developers/companies ... no downloadable source codes no nothing , just commecially available good linux games from the shops ... implying no(or impossible to have) "free sequels and alternatives" ...

i think many people just want a "pure" linux solutions that can do without windows systems(as they are going to purchase windows games anyway , expensively or not) ... "maintaining" both linux and windows systems only to find out that they are actually going back and forth within the same thing seems unnecessarily repetitive and "dumb" ...



.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 07:46 AM   #24
rogerbennett
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: red hat, Xandros, Puppy.
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by alred View Post
is it possible to do commercial linux games like how people are writing windows games ... ??
.
Well, its technically feasible, but my argument is that it isn't commercially possible. You can target a closed-source game for any platform, as long as you are mindful of its capabilities and your development budget.

Another option, raised by Teabag(above) was for linux-community teams to work alongside commercial developers, which is difficult to implement because the developer/publisher want to work closed source to gain a competitive edge.

The third way is just good old open source game development, but sourceforge (for example) isn't delivering the goods as far as games are concerned and I suspect it'll be a long time before a "great" free linux game becomes available.

I don't understand what you mean by a "pure" linux system though? what does that refer to?

I am now getting curious just how big the linux games market is, and how many units you could expect to ship - especially with respect to an earlier comment about the south-east-asia territories.

However, this thread is deviating from the poll it started out as - and the results (few as they are) show most people in support of publishers targeting linux for mainstream games. I've publicly gone on the record saying I voted 'no' - are there any 'yes' voters willing to share why they think so?
 
Old 12-11-2007, 06:26 AM   #25
alred
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: singapore
Distribution: puppy and Ubuntu and ... erh ... redhat(sort of) :( ... + the venerable bsd and solaris ^_^
Posts: 658
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 31
>> "I don't understand what you mean by a "pure" linux system though? what does that refer to?"

i'm refering to people who want to have linux instead of windows systems as their desktop and they dont mind losing touch with windows games ...

probably linux games are the one that can only convince me of really getting myself a better pc with proper graphic card ...




.
 
Old 12-12-2007, 11:42 AM   #26
Furrage
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogerbennett View Post
I've publicly gone on the record saying I voted 'no' - are there any 'yes' voters willing to share why they think so?
I voted yes for the most obvious reason, I want to be able to play great (windows) games on my linux box, running as a linux native app. Until then I have to keep switching to windows to do that.

That does not mean linux will make a good market, but the poll did not ask that. It just asked if developers should target the linux platform and, from an end user perspective who wants everthing including the pie with the cherry on top, yes. I want great games on linux.

I also agree with the argument for pure linux systems. If I can do everything I want on linux, I will say goodbye to Microsoft. However I am a novice user, so anything beyond an Out of the Box (OOB) experience will have me rebooting to windows everytime. I am not up to troubleshooting (wastes time, too technical, etc), and tar is still beyond me. When that can be fixed, I'll switch. Until then linux is just an experiment.

BTW: A few great games for linux, without interface issues, etc, would be a great improvement to the OOB experience, and make it more likely for me spend money on linux games.
 
Old 12-12-2007, 01:50 PM   #27
JBailey742
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Saint Louis Park, MN
Distribution: Mandriva 2007.1 Spring
Posts: 338

Rep: Reputation: 30
Some retail stores just don't have Linux regardless. I remember seeing Best Buy with Suse 10.0 or 10.1, and even Linspire. Now they ONLY have WINDOWS Vista. Only. No linux whatsoever!
Companies know or should know that Linux isn't some home based little hobby of a system that only a selected few care to toy around with.
It's far more advanced than some home project. They should make Windows and Linux, or Windows, Mac and Linux.
 
Old 12-12-2007, 04:58 PM   #28
evoc
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Location: La Spezia, Italy
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
obviously yes...
why there are 3 "no" votes?
every company should develop their games for linux...
 
Old 12-12-2007, 07:15 PM   #29
dracolich
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,274

Rep: Reputation: 63
Quote:
Originally posted by JBailey742
Some retail stores just don't have Linux regardless. I remember seeing Best Buy with Suse 10.0 or 10.1, and even Linspire. Now they ONLY have WINDOWS Vista. Only. No linux whatsoever!
I saw the same thing at a CompUSA once. It was Suse 10.1 hiding on a top shelf. The next time I went it was gone and I haven't another Linux in that store since then.

Quote:
Originally posted by evoc
every company should develop their games for linux...
Let's make up a hypothetical scenario. Let's pretend I'm a game software company and you're a Linux gamer. I've listened to the demand and decided to port my game to Linux. First I consider how much it already costs to make it for Windows. I'll say $10 per copy and it sells for $20. It sells really well because there are a lot of Windows gamers. Now I need to either hire or train people to write the game engine to work in *nix. If I already have a Mac port it won't be as difficult and with open source code and utilities that I can use in the engine it becomes even less difficult. Now the port is finished and released on the market. I'll say it cost only $6 to make each copy and will sell for $15.

Now, here on the forum it's already been mentioned that ~80% of all desktop computers run Windows and it's a good bet that most of them are gamers. It's also been mentioned that Linux desktop share is increasing to around 10% but how many of them are gamers interested in my particular game? I've released 1,000,000 copies of my Linux port in game stores around the world. If I need to sell 500,000 copies to begin making a profit on it, how likely is it?

Now let's say I only sold 250,000 and now my annual profits are down. I have to make up for it so I scrap the Linux port idea and either raise the price of the Windows version or reduce the cost of the next product by reducing features. End of hypothetical scenario.

So you see, there would be a lot of risk to the company and if the company suffered and had to recover the consumers will be the ones who pay and suffer most. I can think of only one way it would work - if both Windows and Linux versions were bundled together in the same box but then instead of costing only $20 it might cost $30 or $40. For one company it might work while for another it might be a total flop. That's how I see it and that's why I said no.
 
Old 12-13-2007, 01:22 PM   #30
Alien_Hominid
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Lithuania
Distribution: Hybrid
Posts: 2,247

Rep: Reputation: 53
Eveything depends on "normal" xorg. And i really find xorg one of the most unstable and buggy software around. Second goes alsa. If somebody wrote an engine for linux, they would like to be sure that this engine could be used at least for several games (like ut3 engine was sold to lots of other games), but now with constantly changing X it's not the case yet.

Last edited by Alien_Hominid; 12-13-2007 at 01:23 PM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sign Petition to EA Games. Adony Linux - Games 11 05-19-2008 09:32 PM
Be sure to Vote. mickeyboa General 1 12-20-2006 07:03 AM
What do you vote for? scott_R General 19 01-24-2004 02:30 PM
VOTE now js_530 General 15 01-05-2004 04:42 PM
vote here fool_inteligent Linux - Distributions 5 09-06-2002 02:16 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software > Linux - Games

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration