Linux From ScratchThis Forum is for the discussion of LFS.
LFS is a project that provides you with the steps necessary to build your own custom Linux system.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
gnew [ / ]$ vlc
VLC media player 2.2.1 Terry Pratchett (Weatherwax) (revision 2.2.1-0-ga425c42)
Home directory not accessible: Permissão negada
[0000000001fbe168] pulse audio output error: PulseAudio server connection failure: Conexão recusada
[0000000001fd63a8] core interface error: no suitable interface module
[0000000001ed2128] core libvlc error: interface "globalhotkeys,none" initialization failed
[0000000001fd63a8] dbus interface error: Failed to connect to the D-Bus session daemon: Using X11 for dbus-daemon autolaunch was disabled at compile time, set your DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS instead
[0000000001fd63a8] core interface error: no suitable interface module
[0000000001ed2128] core libvlc error: interface "dbus,none" initialization failed
[0000000001ed2128] core libvlc: Executando o VLC com a interface padrão. Use 'cvlc' para usar o VLC sem interface.
[0000000001fd63a8] core interface error: corrupt module: /usr/lib/vlc/plugins/lua/liblua_plugin.so
Interface de controle remoto iniciada. Digite `help' para ajuda.
I find it odd that you are running this from the root directory ("/"). Then it is saying that home directory is not accessible. I would look into that first ...
I think it's something connected to the folder permission , or something. For as the root VLC does not work , there added a User and is giving this error.
Does anyone have any tips to create the User and give the appropriate permissions ?
I think it's something connected to the folder permission , or something. For as the root VLC does not work , there added a User and is giving this error.
Does anyone have any tips to create the User and give the appropriate permissions ?
Read the useradd man page and then check what defaults useradd uses in your distro. In the distro im using the default useradd config is in /etc/default/useradd.
Just out of curiosity have you tried starting vlc in command line mode? That might help eliminate permissions as a problem. To start it with the command line interface type "cvlc" in a term window and hit enter.
Distribution: Void, Linux From Scratch, Slackware64
Posts: 3,150
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamison20000e
Do many people use LFS long term? ...
Yes! A number of regular contributers to this forum do and presumably many more, I myself have been using LFS/BLFS as my main desktop system for a number of years now and would never go back to a bloated mainline distro.
I've recently converted from Slackware to LFS. Ask me again in a year, but I have no plan to go back to any mainline distro either. I can always find something I don't like about the way other people do things.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnew
I recompilling vlc using flag --enable-run-as-root.
And... now, other error:
It's been well over ten years since I'v looked at LFS. Before posting my second link I read around thinking to find that it is to learn by and not for long term use\security but guess that changed, tho I do wonder how many are "secure" or more so?
It's been well over ten years since I'v looked at LFS. Before posting my second link I read around thinking to find that it is to learn by and not for long term use\security but guess that changed, tho I do wonder how many are "secure" or more so?
That was my initial thoughts too before actually trying LFS, that it was somehow an incomplete system only for learning purposes. But after trying it out, I found it is surprisingly complete and very functional. In terms of security, as long as you have an up-to-date packages, is it not as secure as any other distro? I would think the security comes with the packages (or the patches from the package developers).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.