Linux From ScratchThis Forum is for the discussion of LFS.
LFS is a project that provides you with the steps necessary to build your own custom Linux system.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi I,m building my 2nd Blfs I have got to The Driver section, I,m building it on the same machine I used last time with Problems with the Drivers http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...ymlink-874031/
My Question is is it worth trying earlier vesa drivers? If so can i change to an earlier driver if it still wont work eg vesa 2.2.0 then change to the previous version?
The main problem in your previous try seemed to be the kernel version and lack of good support for your graphics device. If I remember correctly, using the vesa driver did not work either.
You might want to check the latest stable kernel (2.6.39 at the moment). If you look at the change log it seems that some work has been done related to the i915 driver.
I have got this from Ubuntu forums https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/maveric...2.0-1ubuntu5.2
Yes I could not get any screen at all on the machine although it worked when put in different machine.
Do you think that a newer kernel "mightbe" the ans as apposed to going backwards
Ubuntu 10.10 uses the 2.6.35 kernel (probably altered by the Ubuntu team). Besides that, I'm not sure if you can use that specific Ubuntu package and build it under LFS.
Quote:
Yes I could not get any screen at all on the machine although it worked when put in different machine.
Do you think that a newer kernel "mightbe" the ans as apposed to going backwards
I think it is worth a try, although there are no guarantees.
You already know that previous kernels did not seem to work on that specific piece of hardware. Your previous attempt was with LFS 6.7 (kernel 2.6.35.4) and you did try to upgrade to 2.6.38. Both failed. I'm assuming you are using LFS 6.8 at the moment, which uses kernel 2.6.37 and there is a high probability that this will also not work.
About downgrading: I don't have any experience with downgrading the kernel (to a lower version than initially used in LFS). If you do want to try this you need to go back to a kernel version that is older then 2.6.35.
Just to be sure: I still believe this issue is kernel related, changing to a different X or xserver version won't solve this issue.
Hi again I have built my 2nd blfs with intel graphics as per book, I got the grey screen when running
Code:
X -retro -config ~/xorg.conf.new
I have 1 problem mouse dosn't work, the Keyboard didn't work fixed that via old thread cheers Druuna, I adjusted all the settings in xorg.config that was suggested, I get
Code:
EE AlpsPS/2 ALPS GlidePointer no synaptics device found
ALL FAULTS POINT TO ALPS.
Now to set the kernel again /usr/share/doc/linux-2.6.35 then do I run the commands as before
Code:
make mrproper etc etc
then find the settings for synaptics?
My querey is location of Linux-2.6.35 is this correct /usr/share/doc/. AS other post pointed to /usr/src ??
Thats why i queried it The lfs book shows "8.3.3. Contents of Linux
Installed files:
config-2.6.35.4, vmlinux-2.6.35.4-lfs-6.7-2.6.35.4, and System.map-2.6.35.4
Thats why i queried it The lfs book shows "8.3.3. Contents of Linux
Installed files:
config-2.6.35.4, vmlinux-2.6.35.4-lfs-6.7-2.6.35.4, and System.map-2.6.35.4
Yes, it does. In my opinion the LFS team should have added some information about the de facto location of the kernel source files. The only "hint" it provides is in one of the warning boxes (8.3.1. Installation of the kernel)
Quote:
By the way strange xorg screen works this time No fidderling with anything.
I am glad to read that, but puzzling though Maybe something did go wrong in your previous attempt.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.