Linux From Scratch This Forum is for the discussion of LFS.
LFS is a project that provides you with the steps necessary to build your own custom Linux system. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
04-21-2005, 10:05 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Oregon
Distribution: Slackware ATM
Posts: 10
Rep:
|
LFS 6, chapter 6.11; Glibc 'make check' error
Hi, I am going thru LFS 6.0 for the first time and everything was going smooth till chapter '6.11 glibc-2.3.4-20042701' I checked to make sure I typed the configure command exactly as it's shown in the book and make went off without a hitch. Make check however ended with:
Code:
GCONV_PATH=/sources/glibc-build/iconvdata LC_ALL=C /sources/glibc-build/elf/ld-linux.so.2
--library-path /sources/glibc-build:/sources/glibc-build/math:/sources/glibc-
build/elf:/sources/glibc-build/dlfcn:/sources/glibc-build/nss:/sources/glibc-
build/nis:/sources/glibc-build/rt:/sources/glibc-build/resolv:/sources/glibc-
build/crypt:/sources/glibc-build/nptl /sources/glibc-build//nptl/tst-rwlock14
> /sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock14.out
Didn't expect signal from child: got 'Segmentation fault'
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock14.out] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/glibc-2.3.4-20040701/nptl'
make[1]: *** [nptl/tests] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/sources/glibc-2.3.4-20040701'
make: *** [check] Error 2
Searching for an answer the only thing I could come up with was in the wiki( http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/ind...2.3.4-20040510) and all it says is
Quote:
If the kernel of your host system was compiled with gcc 2.x.x, several of the nptl
tests will fail, with "Didn't expect signal from child: got `Segmentation fault'":
mutex8, cond7, cond8, once3, once4, join5, cancel(1-7,10,13,15-18,20,21), clock2 (note: no seg fault),
cancelx(2-7,10,13,15-18,20,21), oncex3, oncex4
|
it doesn't mention if it's critical or not and it's for glibc-2.3.4-20040510 so I'm not sure it would apply to my situation anyway.
My host system is the LFS live cd and my questions are: How important is this error? If it's really important how do I fix it?
I'll start over if I have to but I'd kinda like to avoid that if I can
Last edited by Zamochit; 04-21-2005 at 02:33 PM.
|
|
|
04-21-2005, 02:28 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Oregon
Distribution: Slackware ATM
Posts: 10
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Also, I'm not sure if it matters or not, but running 'make check' again ran thru with no errors.
|
|
|
05-04-2005, 12:31 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914
Rep:
|
It's been months since I compiled glibc but I'm fairly certain that make check bombed out on me. I've long since forgotten what the error was but evidently it wasn't critical. I've been done with BLFS and have compiled tons of programs after that even. No problems here. I know it doesn't give you a very good feeling, but if I were you, I would try not to let it bother you...
Keep in mind, there are the mailing lists for LFS and BLFS. No offense to anyone here or this board in general, but they are far superior when it comes to asking technical questions eg- specific errors and what not. The mailing lists are VERY active as well. Your post would NEVER have gone 2 weeks without a response. A day tops... Food for thought if you have any more problems.
Last edited by jong357; 05-04-2005 at 12:34 AM.
|
|
|
05-04-2005, 09:50 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Oregon
Distribution: Slackware ATM
Posts: 10
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hey thanks for the response Jong357. I gave up on an answer and just continued on. I'm no expert but I think everything is fine. I got to the end of the book anyway. Everything boots and I'm waiting for some more free time before I start on BLFS. I'll keep the mailing lists in mind for any troubles I may run across.
|
|
|
05-04-2005, 06:28 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914
Rep:
|
cool.. Yea, I don't think you'll have any problems. It got to a certain point where I just consider the 'make check's a huge waste of time. Install X first, get it connected to the internet and then install firefox/thunderbird or the mozilla suite... that way it becomes fairly self sufficent and you can stay in LFS instead of having to reboot all the time just to post on the web and such....
|
|
|
05-31-2005, 12:54 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Distribution: Slackware 10.2
Posts: 669
Rep:
|
I got that error doing the make check thing but I just igoned it. Everything went fine from there. The LFS people must know about this by now.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|