LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Linux From Scratch
User Name
Password
Linux From Scratch This Forum is for the discussion of LFS.
LFS is a project that provides you with the steps necessary to build your own custom Linux system.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-02-2018, 08:48 PM   #1
maschelsea
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2016
Distribution: Slackware 64bit 14.2
Posts: 468

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
binutils check fails - 6.16


I've found one test that MIGHT fail here on the forums - dejagnu, which I'll ignore, but there are others also. I piped my run to a file. I'm not sure if this forum allows the necessary capacity to paste the entire file. At the end, I grepped the file for the string "Error" and came up with six:


Can these be safely ignored?

Code:
make[5]: *** [Makefile:3668: check-DEJAGNU] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.30/build/ld'
make[4]: *** [Makefile:1920: check-am] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.30/build/ld'
make[3]: *** [Makefile:1760: check-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.30/build/ld'
make[2]: *** [Makefile:1922: check] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.30/build/ld'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:7511: check-ld] Error 2
make[2]: Entering directory '/sources/binutils-2.30/build/libiberty'
make[3]: Entering directory '/sources/binutils-2.30/build/libiberty/testsuite'
./test-demangle < ../../../libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected
./test-demangle: 995 tests, 0 failures
./test-demangle < ../../../libiberty/testsuite/d-demangle-expected
./test-demangle: 323 tests, 0 failures
./test-demangle < ../../../libiberty/testsuite/rust-demangle-expected
./test-demangle: 36 tests, 0 failures
./test-pexecute
./test-expandargv
PASS: test-expandargv-0.
PASS: test-expandargv-1.
PASS: test-expandargv-2.
PASS: test-expandargv-3.
PASS: test-expandargv-4.
PASS: test-expandargv-5.
PASS: test-expandargv-6.
./test-strtol
PASS: test-strtol-0.
PASS: test-strtol-1.
PASS: test-strtol-2.
PASS: test-strtol-3.
PASS: test-strtol-4.
PASS: test-strtol-5.
PASS: test-strtol-6.
PASS: test-strtol-7.
PASS: test-strtol-8.
PASS: test-strtol-9.
PASS: test-strtol-10.
PASS: test-strtol-11.
PASS: test-strtol-12.
PASS: test-strtol-13.
PASS: test-strtol-14.
PASS: test-strtol-15.
PASS: test-strtol-16.
PASS: test-strtol-17.
PASS: test-strtol-18.
PASS: test-strtol-19.
PASS: test-strtol-20.
make[3]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.30/build/libiberty/testsuite'
make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.30/build/libiberty'
make[1]: Target 'check-host' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check-target'.
make[1]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.30/build'
make: *** [Makefile:2174: do-check] Error 2
make: Target 'check' not remade because of errors.
 
Old 04-03-2018, 06:49 AM   #2
hazel
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 7,564
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446
FAIL is the string to look for. The book mentions one test that fails.
 
Old 04-03-2018, 09:45 AM   #3
maschelsea
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2016
Distribution: Slackware 64bit 14.2
Posts: 468

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Code:
(lfs chroot) root:/$ grep FAIL ~/binutils-check.txt 
FAIL: PLT PC-relative offset overflow check
(lfs chroot) root:/$
 
Old 04-03-2018, 09:48 AM   #4
maschelsea
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2016
Distribution: Slackware 64bit 14.2
Posts: 468

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Is it safe for me to proceed? The FAIL I have was not the one mentioned in the book. If not, what should I do at this point?
 
Old 04-03-2018, 10:52 AM   #5
hazel
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 7,564
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446Reputation: 4446
I've been told a few times that a single unexpected failure isn't fatal. A string of them means that something is wrong.
 
Old 04-03-2018, 10:53 AM   #6
maschelsea
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2016
Distribution: Slackware 64bit 14.2
Posts: 468

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
So I can proceed? OK I'll try. Thank you for your help.

Last edited by maschelsea; 04-03-2018 at 10:56 AM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LFS 8.1: Binutils make -k check failed at Makefile line 2174 'do-check' OedipusR3x Linux From Scratch 3 03-04-2018 06:24 PM
[SOLVED] Binutils - 6.13 again - check error jimmy_page_89 Linux From Scratch 4 11-27-2011 03:22 PM
Binutils Check Error LinuxLuvr Linux From Scratch 1 07-21-2005 04:07 PM
installing binutils 2.15, make claims the cpp fails the sanity check 2verb Linux - Software 1 07-23-2004 11:59 PM
binutils make check fails atari24 Linux From Scratch 1 07-10-2004 03:08 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Linux From Scratch

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration