Linux From ScratchThis Forum is for the discussion of LFS.
LFS is a project that provides you with the steps necessary to build your own custom Linux system.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
does anyone know when linux-libc-headers-2.6.12 will make its appearance? I've been visiting Mariusz Mazur's page on a daily basis since the 2.6.12 linux kernel has been released, but there isn't any update, and I've seen today the kernel tree has jumped from linux-2.6.12-git10 to linux-2.6.13-rc1-git1, so... now that the kernel tree is going towards the next version, the libc headers can be released in a few days, or maybe there's no official release date and we'll have to wait some more days (or even weeks?)
he has the 2.6.12.0 headers now...but now I need the 2.6.13, so I can start using grsec again in the kernel..!
go there as often as you want to stay updated to mmazur's progress on the linux-libc-headers.
Although, you can probably do the headers yourself, just like its done in the LFS 5.* book, using the 2.4 kernels.
Take a look at that book and you should be able to use the kernel headers directly.
at least in the 2.6 kernel series, it's supposed to NOT being an elegant solution to use straight kernel headers, but precisely it REFUSES to compile the next package due to the headers being too old
at least in the 2.6 kernel series, it's supposed to NOT being an elegant solution to use straight kernel headers
its not, but 2.6.13 is the only version of 2.6.13 series available (as far as stable is concerned). So its the only headers available.
However, try this.
The initial kernel headers and installation sets the lowest possible kernel version to use. If you use the kernel headers and the kernel of 2.6.12.5 to build your system. Once the system is built, turn around and apply the 2.6.13 patch file to your kernel (best results, leave the kernel vanilla before doing this). Once that is done, you should hopefully be able to use 2.6.13 and patches thereof.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.