LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Linux From Scratch
User Name
Password
Linux From Scratch This Forum is for the discussion of LFS.
LFS is a project that provides you with the steps necessary to build your own custom Linux system.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-30-2012, 04:46 AM   #1
neohexane
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
(6.17. GCC-4.6.2) Is it safe to continue after these libmudflap errors?


The LFS 7.1 book says that it's not safe to move on if you have had errors that differ vastly to this after doing "make -k check" for GCC. Would you say that my errors differ a lot from the errors in the link, and is it safe for me to move on? I'm building on openSUSE latest version 32-bit KDE.



Code:
                === libmudflap tests ===

Schedule of variations:
    unix

Running target unix
Using /tools/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for target.
Using /tools/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using /sources/gcc-4.6.2/libmudflap/testsuite/config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running /sources/gcc-4.6.2/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.c/cfrags.exp ...
FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail40-frag.c output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass51-frag.c execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass51-frag.c execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail40-frag.c (-O2) output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O2) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O2) output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O2) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O2) output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass51-frag.c (-O2) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass51-frag.c (-O2) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail40-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O3) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O3) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass51-frag.c (-O3) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass51-frag.c (-O3) execution test
Running /sources/gcc-4.6.2/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.c/externs.exp ...
Running /sources/gcc-4.6.2/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.c++/c++frags.exp ...
Running /sources/gcc-4.6.2/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.c++/ctors.exp ...
Running /sources/gcc-4.6.2/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.cth/cthfrags.exp ...

Last edited by neohexane; 06-30-2012 at 04:47 AM. Reason: Asked if safe to move on.
 
Old 06-30-2012, 11:00 AM   #2
spiky0011
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: PLANET-SPIKE
Distribution: /LFS/Debian
Posts: 2,511
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 412Reputation: 412Reputation: 412Reputation: 412Reputation: 412
Hi

I have googled and havn't found alot to help out, I know this dosn't help
Did you use the part
Code:
ulimit -s 16384
I did find alot of reports about libmudflap failiure acceptable but to what extent no one sayes.
Maybe rebuild gcc again, remove the gcc-4.6.2 dir and gcc-build dir and start again see if the same failures appear.
Did you copy and paste the commands to build gcc?
I hope someone can come along and give a positive ans If not I might be inclined to carry on.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-30-2012, 09:32 PM   #3
pidsley
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I'm working the book right now, and that list looks very much like what I got on the gcc tests, and also very much like the list the online book says to check against:

Quote:
Results can be compared with those located at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/7.1/ and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/.
This list is from the first link:

Code:
Running target unix
Using /tools/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for target.
Using /tools/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using /sources/gcc-4.6.2/libmudflap/testsuite/config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running /sources/gcc-4.6.2/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.c/cfrags.exp ...
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O2) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O2) output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O2) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O2) output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O3) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O3) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass49-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test
Running /sources/gcc-4.6.2/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.c/externs.exp ...
Running /sources/gcc-4.6.2/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.c++/c++frags.exp ...
Running /sources/gcc-4.6.2/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.c++/ctors.exp ...
Running /sources/gcc-4.6.2/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.cth/cthfrags.exp ...

		=== libmudflap Summary ===

# of expected passes		1415
# of unexpected failures	12
I am proceeding with my build.

Last edited by pidsley; 06-30-2012 at 09:36 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-02-2012, 11:42 AM   #4
neohexane
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Posts: 2

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Ah, it's okay. I went through the rest of the book as normal, and I successfully booted the system with no errors. I just thought that there were too many of those libmudflap errors, even though they looked similar.
 
Old 07-02-2012, 12:16 PM   #5
spiky0011
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: PLANET-SPIKE
Distribution: /LFS/Debian
Posts: 2,511
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 412Reputation: 412Reputation: 412Reputation: 412Reputation: 412
Hi

Glad it all worked out ok
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
safe free() in gcc? KillerCode Programming 5 12-30-2010 11:23 AM
rsync continue on errors? Blash Linux - Newbie 6 10-24-2009 04:30 PM
[SOLVED] Using old gcc. How to do? Is it safe? kaz2100 Debian 2 12-28-2008 09:14 AM
Glibc make check errors, safe to continue kummiliim Linux From Scratch 0 03-02-2008 04:40 PM
e2fsprogs-install failure :safe to continue ? LFS v 6.2 lfs-fan Linux From Scratch 0 08-02-2007 06:14 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Linux From Scratch

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration