Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back > Forums > Enterprise Linux Forums > Linux - Enterprise
User Name
Linux - Enterprise This forum is for all items relating to using Linux in the Enterprise.


  Search this Thread
Old 12-15-2006, 04:41 AM   #1
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: New Zealand
Distribution: Suse, Red Hat, AIX
Posts: 12

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question Looking for opinions on HA clustering solution

Been needing to setup some clusters for HA - not compute, just HA at this stage, and have been thinking along these lines:

- HA across multiple rooms - hence cannot use SAN as single store, so use dbrd to 'remote mirror' the disks
- heartbeat for the actual cluster failover, with at least 2 links (RS232 and LAN)
- Its all IBM hardware, use IBM director to kill (STONITH) the failed node if I can reach it at all
- Centralise authentication with NIS, one master and one slave
- use rsync to ensure all printers are matched

Alternative - give up the replicated storage, and use a SAN for single storage and Red Hat Cluster Suite.

Most of these customers now have all their hardware, including IBM servers and Red Hat distro from AS2.1 to ES3, running Informix. All have an IBM SAN as well for shared storage.

My question is, anyone doing something similar that might have some nuggets of info (like "nah it didn't work for us" or "watch xxx")? Or anyone got some better ideas that might be more suitable?

Thanks for any help!
Old 12-15-2006, 05:43 AM   #2
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.04 & 10.10, RHEL 4 & 5
Posts: 48
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 16
We are using AIX 5.2 with HACMP on our two primary servers. The BIG things to watch out for are the syncing of printer definitions, user definitons, and the program installs (make sure to install new programs/updates on both machines with the same paths). It uses a heartbeat via a dedicated 1GB fiber port between the two machines (nothing else between - don't add another point of failure).

This has now been running for 3 years, with the only switchover failures occurring because of the aforementioned syncing and once because the heartbeat link was through a switch that had a port failure.

Good luck - HA takes time and patience to get right.
Old 12-21-2006, 06:16 PM   #3
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Indiana
Distribution: fc6 sles9 & 10 kubuntu ubuntu-server
Posts: 240
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 30
I've been working on some HA and clustering myself. Still haven'd decided on the way I want to do it.

Regarding using the SAN though keep in mind that you need a cluster aware file system. Probably GFS since you are using Red Hat. If you did want to use a SAN disk across multiple rooms you could try exporting them from the machine connected to the SAN as iscsi if that's available on the versions of RH that you are using. A word of caution-it has made great leaps and bounds in the last few months so you may run into incompatibilites and dependency problems if installing on older OSs.

drbd works well with non-shared disks. I have this setup now and it works great.

When it's all said and done you will most likely have done a lot of reading and experimenting. As w7hd said, it takes time and patience to get it right.
Old 06-12-2007, 03:59 AM   #4
Registered: Jun 2007
Location: Munich, Germany
Distribution: RHEL, CentOS, Fedora, SLES (...)
Posts: 399

Rep: Reputation: 39
With Red Hat's Cluster Suite and Global Filesystem it is possible to setup diskless cluster nodes that boot the same sharedroot filesystem directly from the SAN. Because all nodes have read/write access to all files on the cluster filesystem there is no need to replicate the data. All changes are instantly valid for all nodes. The servers are reduced to metal boxes with no intelligence.

Usually nodes are placed in different fire compartments within a data center. For critical applications it is adviseable to connect different data centers with fibre to replicate the SAN. So you can build a second cluster at a remote location.

Although replication is good for many situations a SAN based HA-solution is the advanced choice. You are rewarded with great scalability and easy management.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Greenplum Wins Award for Best Clustering Solution at LinuxWorld LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-20-2006 09:21 PM
Opinions on Scalix or other solutions as a linux groupware solution ryamc Linux - Software 0 08-17-2006 08:35 PM
clustering? tsunami_imcool Linux - Networking 1 03-01-2006 11:05 PM
Clustering Stephanie General 5 01-29-2004 12:04 AM
New to clustering... sb73542 Linux - Networking 2 07-31-2003 11:05 AM > Forums > Enterprise Linux Forums > Linux - Enterprise

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration