LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Enterprise Linux Forums > Linux - Enterprise
User Name
Password
Linux - Enterprise This forum is for all items relating to using Linux in the Enterprise.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-08-2008, 10:23 AM   #1
Dankles
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: /dev/null
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 245

Rep: Reputation: 31
Linux Servers vs latest Microsoft stuff


Hey all,
I've been an Microsoft Admin for about 5 years now and I'm trying to make the jump onto the Linux bandwagon. I have used linux as my workstation for about 3 years and I really enjoy it.

So I've been wondering what kind of setups people are "really" using in their linux production environments and how people like it. And if possible I'd like sort of a comparison to Microsoft products like exchange server, SMS, MOM, Active Directory, ect...

I've never seen a full linux production environment and I'd love to know how people feel about theirs.

Thanks
 
Old 02-08-2008, 12:14 PM   #2
msound
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: SoCal
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 465

Rep: Reputation: 30
hey hey! I'm currently back in an MS shop - but am really missing the linux environment of my previous employer.

We had a thin client environment where most of our users were using SunRay thin client terminals. We had 2 RHEL4 thin client servers that served up the RHEL4 desktop for the thin clients.

Users' home directories were stored on a central SAN and mounted via NFS during login. Centralized user authentication was handled by NIS and Kerberos.

We used the Zimbra Collaboration suite for email/webmail, contact management, and calendars.

We had two Windows 2003 Terminal Servers - then gave each user an IE icon on their desktop which launched rdesktop and logged them into the Windows Terminal Server and launched IE automatically.

We had a CUPS print server which shared all of the HP JetDirect Print Servers we had around the office.

We used StarOffice for documents and spreadsheets.

And when I left we were testing out CrossOver Office to get IE6 to run through wine so we could phase out the windows terminal servers all together.

God I miss that environment...
 
Old 02-08-2008, 03:07 PM   #3
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 269Reputation: 269Reputation: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by msound View Post
hey hey! I'm currently back in an MS shop - but am really missing the linux environment of my previous employer.

We had a thin client environment where most of our users were using SunRay thin client terminals. We had 2 RHEL4 thin client servers that served up the RHEL4 desktop for the thin clients.

Users' home directories were stored on a central SAN and mounted via NFS during login. Centralized user authentication was handled by NIS and Kerberos.

We used the Zimbra Collaboration suite for email/webmail, contact management, and calendars.

We had two Windows 2003 Terminal Servers - then gave each user an IE icon on their desktop which launched rdesktop and logged them into the Windows Terminal Server and launched IE automatically.

We had a CUPS print server which shared all of the HP JetDirect Print Servers we had around the office.

We used StarOffice for documents and spreadsheets.

And when I left we were testing out CrossOver Office to get IE6 to run through wine so we could phase out the windows terminal servers all together.

God I miss that environment...
Still too much Windows for me, so I wouldn't miss it. I miss our setup at a previous employer where all the developers had their own Linux workstation, with their /home directories via AFS and authentication done through AFS with Kerberos. I learned that if you want to do remote mounts of home directories on a central server, drop NFS and go with AFS. More redundant, faster and never failed.

AFS = Andrew File System for those not familiar with it.
 
Old 02-08-2008, 04:18 PM   #4
msound
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: SoCal
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 465

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Still too much Windows for me
Unfortunately there are still some websites out there that require IE. The industry the company was in required us to log into a lot of industry specific websites that required users to use IE.

We had a single NFS server serving approx. 90 thin client users without any issues. There was only one time in about 6 months that the NFS service had to be restarted.

We had actually just started researching openafs before I left. From what I've read it's a dream to administer but a major pain in the butt to initially setup.

edit: http://www.openafs.org/
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Microsoft Photosynth: more cool stuff arcanex General 1 06-04-2007 08:45 PM
LXer: Microsoft .NET LATEST STORIES LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-28-2006 01:03 PM
LXer: Microsoft and Linux Rivals Refocus on SMB Servers, Channel ... LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-24-2006 05:54 PM
Microsoft servers efficient than LINUX khaleel5000 General 14 04-17-2006 04:39 AM
Microsoft ISA Firewall Returns Port Scan Warnings From Linux BIND DNS Servers. ramram29 Linux - Security 4 01-26-2004 10:09 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Enterprise Linux Forums > Linux - Enterprise

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration