Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I work for a school district with no money and old hardware. Part of my job is refurbing PCs to put back in the classroom and SOP has been to load them with Windows 98 (these PCs are PII/IIIs and would take Windows 2000 but the district is picky about licensing issues) so I'm looking for a Linux distro that looks like Windows and that comes loaded with at least Firefox and OpenOffice.
I've tried Linux PC and it looks okay and comes with Firefox (I had to install OpenOffice) but, so far, it seems slower than the same computer on Win98. Plus I'm unclear how to attach it to the Windows 2003 network (mapped shares, network printers, etc.) but that's a separate issue.
please don't try to compare a version of windows released 8 years ago with a versino of linux released today... that's a totally unfair comparison... you can easily strip a desktop back to something functionally equivalent to Win98's GUI, but that's taking a step backwards compared to current functionalites often already out performing Vista in some places.
there are distro's like LinuxXP which try to be VERY similar if that's what you honestly want. in terms of good all-round distros for non technical people, somethign like ubuntu or MEPIS are the current trend.
Sorry, I said Linux PC when I meant to say Linux XP.
BOF, thanks, I'll give Linspire a try.
Chris, the reality is that while Win98 is 8 years old and retarded compared to modern-day Linux, it's still an interface that all of my user-base is familiar with and I can "legally" install it wherever I need to.
If I had my way, I would install something like Ubuntu but I don't have that kind of muscle in my job. I was hoping for something with basic functionality (internet, word processing) that I could tie into the network (note my newbie tag) and that looked like what my people are used to.
Maybe a streamlined linux distro would work for me too. I would need a gui (probably Gnome), internet (Firefox?), word processing (OpenOffice?) and as little extra as possible. And I would prefer to be able to just install the system without having to install the extras (Linux XP included Firefox and made it very easy to install OO). Do you have any recommendations?
For ease of use I liked the SUSE Distro it setup easy was rather easy to negotiate and was easy to install things in. The Linux XP was a great Windows XP look alike and act alike but when it came to running Linux applications it couldnt stand up.
On the Linux XP box I found that it couldnt install alot of applications easily and that it wouldnt run a lot of applications right away.
Suse is a good Distro to get for your machines and will allow you to customize it to your needs.
I personally run Slackware on my machines because I have found that I can use anything with it and it is a very stable distro.
Sorry, I said Linux PC when I meant to say Linux XP.
Chris, the reality is that while Win98 is 8 years old and retarded compared to modern-day Linux, it's still an interface that all of my user-base is familiar with and I can "legally" install it wherever I need to.
You might want to check out FVWM95. It is lightweight and looks exactly like the Win95/98 interface - well, exactly like it, except for the lack of the Microsoft Windows logo. It even has the desktop/folder metaphor like newer *nix desktop environments.
Chris, the reality is that while Win98 is 8 years old and retarded compared to modern-day Linux, it's still an interface that all of my user-base is familiar with and I can "legally" install it wherever I need to.
of course, but you wouldn't try to run XP on those boxes would you? so the most common desktops, i.e. gnome and kde are roughly equivalent to XP in terms of resource requirements etc, so if you admit it's a dumb idea running XP on them, it's just as dumb running Gnome 2.14 or Kde 3.4. hence KimVette's suggestions of FVWM95 etc...
Suse with 5 cds is probably more than I want but I'll download it anyway.
I'll look into FVWM but I've always been fuzzy on how Window Managers work with Linux itself and it looks like it's not maintained anymore (last version is dated 2003). Do I need to find a distrobution that supports it or how does that work?
Well, fvwm95 you may have to build yourself. SuSE comes with qvwm, so you can try that. Check out http://www.w3schools.com/html/html_links.asp for more info. At a glance it looks like it is based on the old FVWM-based FVWM95 project.
This is the distro I use and recommend, Why because it works right out of the box. No need to configure Everything, everything just works. It also comes as a 1 CD install that is a live CD that you can install later if you wish.
I would never recommend ReactOS. Have you ever tried to install a video driver on it, especially something like an ATI AiW card? It's a beastly process and far too time consuming to be worthwhile.
I would never recommend ReactOS. Have you ever tried to install a video driver on it, especially something like an ATI AiW card? It's a beastly process and far too time consuming to be worthwhile.
Agreed. I never liked it because... come to think of it, because of everything about it...
Location: Los Angeles (the Great Cultural Wasteland)
Distribution: SuSe 10.2
Posts: 151
Rep:
I'm a Suse lover so... And yes it comes on 5 cds but thats because it comes with a ton of programmes. just take the standard install and go through the options and get rid of what you don't need. Also Suse has a programme that will take that install and you can duplicate it for all the other computers your installing on. Make your life easy. A one click install.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.