Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
installed a Lycoris Desktop/LX i got free on the front of a linux mag and it went in nicely but killed windows xp unfortauntely. I did love the way it booted straight onto a nice user friendly interface but as im using windows xp as my main OS it just wont do.
installed a version of SuSE 8.2 i got from a mate but it was so rubbish it crashed on installation when trying to come to terms with the invention of usb and hotplugging.
downloaded SuSE 9.1 and it had no usb problems, GRUB looked great and the general feel was nice. Unfortunately it always booted into a blank black screen. Thanks to help in the forum i was told to press CTRL+ALT+F1 and managed to get some visual. But it wasnt the nice desktop screen i was greeted with, but some DOS style prompt expecting me to put commands and code and stuff in. No good.
So if anyone can recommend a Linux that will co-exist with Windows XP nicely on the same hard drive then im all ears. And it has to boot into a nice desktop like Lycoris did, not a command prompt because i can't deal with that yet.
Well, try Mandrake then... You'll be running out of noob distro's shortly... Maybe you have a hardware issue with your GPU or driver.... Those specs might help as well.....
Definately Mandrake. I use Fedora now.. but I started out on Mandrake, everything is pretty much done for you and gets you used to the Linux desktop & way of working.
Once you feel you have a general understanding of Linux, its then you can consider alternatives.
MEPIS is a debian-based live-evaluation CD. Just pop it into the CD drive and away you go. Check it out without installing anything to your hard drive. If you like it, it has an install to hard drive icon righton on the desktop. Easiest installation I've yet encountered (I have installed Mandrake, Red Hat, Fedora, and knoppix). Dual booting is not a problem. Package managment uses apt-get, but the kpackage utility is a great graphical way of doing things.
Autodection of hardware seemed to be as good as knoppix. Everything except the winmodem worked immediately. My cable modem was autodetected and the internet settings were auto-configured. Just started surfing.
Hmm.... Thats an awful new ATI card. Dell wanted to pawn one of those off on me when I bought this thing. Said "no thank you, give me an nvidia".... Knew I would run into problems on Linux with a new ATI card.... That was probably what you needed to do with the other distros maybe... Install ATI's Linux drivers. As long as it atleast throws you to a prompt, that would be feasable. Nvidia backs Linux more than ATI so they put more time and effort into making drivers that are easy to install and work really well.... Lets not start a Linux/GPU flame war everyone.... Just talking to myself actually....
Well, give Mandrake a whirl..... It should work..... We have the same hard drive so I know you'll have to stick with the newer distro's that use 2.6 or atleast a patched 2.4 with libata.... For instance, Slackware will not install on your computer unless you use version 10 with the 2.6.7 kernel under /expiermental..... Fedora, Suse and Drake that use the 2.4 like to patch the hell out of their kernels so those will work as well with that drive.
Yea, You just need the first 3 disks if you are going to do a Full Install. If your going to trim it down, you could possibly get away with just the first 2....
Distribution: Mac OS X Leopard 10.6.2, Windows 2003 Server/Vista/7/XP/2000/NT/98, Ubuntux64, CentOS4.8/5.4
Posts: 2,986
Rep:
Mandrake 9.1 - Highly recommended for newbs. Works like a charm for me. If someone tells you to use RedHat, SUSE, Slackware, knoppix, or Debian, then run!!!! Seriously, Mandrake makes it the easiest if you're coming from Windows. A majority will agree with me.
ATI drivers work fine in Mandrake 9.1. Don't listen to the people who can't get it working in Mandrake 9.2 or 10.0. Mandrake 10 is full or problems, as you can tell by looking in the Mandrake forum. Mandrake 9.1 all the way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.