Which distro is lightweight but can still be used for development?
Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Which distro is lightweight but can still be used for development?
I travel quite a lot, and so I use my netbook for developing most of my projects. It currently runs Ubuntu 10.10 which seemed snappy enough, however recently I have been noticing it slowing down. I have tried other distributions, but either I have found that they are too slow, or take up too much screen size (I have a 9" screen), or cannot do what I want. Also, as I am quite a newbie, I can use the command line to install applications, but I prefer things like Synaptic and Ubuntu Software Centre.
Also, my netbook currently boots in about a minute, and is there a way to keep Ubuntu yet speed it up, as I have seen some people boot it in about 15 seconds.
A minimal install ubuntu + Xfce is lighter than xubuntu-desktop, debian Xfce is lighter than minimal ubuntu + Xfce (depending on exactly what you do post-installing).
Well, I have Xubuntu running on a live CD, and it seems to be quite fast. One problem however is that it does not detect my bluetooth adapter, yet this could probably be fixed by installing a bluetooth manager. I will probably install it.
So if on my netbook I removed ubuntu-desktop and installed xfce (Not xubuntu-desktop to keep packages away) I should have a faster boot time?
The boot to display manager time should be slightly faster (maybe slightly faster again if you have removed all the ubuntu-desktop packages). The time from dislplay manager to working desktop should be noticably faster.
Thats with the Xfce4 stuff running without added services like bluetooth managers. The more you add, the more needs to be loaded on booting, the slower booting happens. Dont let that put you off Xfce4 (or *buntu minimal installs), there are bound to be a few services you dont need running with ubuntu-desktop. Even if you loaded up all the services, etc. onto Xfce4 that came with ubuntu-desktop Xfce4 would still be a tiny bit ahead in booting times, etc. IMO.
My guess is that the GUI puts a constant load on processor and RAM. The more lightweight the GUI the more ressources available for the applications started from this GUI.
The disadvantage of the lightweight GUIs is that they obviously don't carry as much applets and integrated stuff as Gnome and KDE do.
When I started once not using Windows anymore as desktop at home, I installed FreeDSD on a laptop with a very small display and only 32 MB RAM (this was in the year 2000). I used Blackbox as window manager because of a very small task bar. Menus opended via the right mouse click.
The task bar in LXDE now carries much more but many utilities rely on KDE or on Gnome as environment. So, it depends mainly on your working style.
There are quite a lot of LXDE based distributions. I think every major distribution has also an LXDE variant.
I did think about Lubuntu but found that I prefer Xfce ove Lxde because of the way it handles notifications and things. I am probably not going to install it for about a week, a faster SSD for my netbook is on the way.
I wouldn't base an opinion on Lxde vs Xfce from lubuntu-desktop and xubuntu-desktop.
Xubuntu-desktop used to be very heavy (heavier than gnome in some ways). The newer versions are lighter, but still are farily heavy compared to some other distros Xfce4 version (or even the Xfce4 package).
You can easily see how many more packages, etc are included in xubuntu-desktop and lubuntu-desktop compared to the xfce4 and lxde ubuntu packages-
My guess is that the GUI puts a constant load on processor and RAM. The more lightweight the GUI the more ressources available for the applications started from this GUI.
It can do, depending on your video card/drivers.
If you've got a decent card from the last 10 years or so with hardware T&L and 32MB+ of RAM, the desktop GUI will be putting virtually no load on the CPU and RAM. If you've got a card with no hardware T&L, and/or using onboard RAM, and/or with poor drivers then the desktop GUI can have a speed impact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatPerson
I am probably not going to install it for about a week, a faster SSD for my netbook is on the way.
That can make a huge impact to boot times. Good luck
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.