Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
11-15-2019, 09:18 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2017
Distribution: Mint, Debian, Q4OS, Mageia, KDE Neon
Posts: 411
Rep:
|
When can you say that a distro is based on another distro ?
And when does one distro diverge so much from the distro it branched off that it can no more be called a fork of it (or based on it) ?
|
|
|
11-15-2019, 09:39 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Elgin,IL,USA
Distribution: KDE Neon
Posts: 1,272
|
I guess it becomes apparent when the base makes changes that are not incorporated in the decedent, or when the branch makes so many changes it not totality compatible any longer.
Most Ubuntu based distros still use it's repos for updates, so once using them starts to break things you are at the threshold.
|
|
|
11-15-2019, 01:18 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Upper Hale, Surrey/Hants Border, UK
Distribution: One main distro, & some smaller ones casually.
Posts: 5,894
Rep: 
|
When they deviate from the originals package management system. 
|
|
|
11-15-2019, 02:43 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Delft, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,674
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatmac
When they deviate from the originals package management system. 
|
That isn't always true as i.e. Suse (and openSUSE) and Mandriva/Mageia are making use of the rpm format and program, but are not based on Red Hat. In fact quite a few other distro's package the rpm program too, as it has become a standard package format.
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RPM_Package_Manager.
I would rather say that "when they still can use the master distro's repositories" is a rather good sign of descent.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
11-16-2019, 04:44 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Upper Hale, Surrey/Hants Border, UK
Distribution: One main distro, & some smaller ones casually.
Posts: 5,894
Rep: 
|
Well, what I said is, if they can't use the original package management repos, because of deviation, that is when it becomes a distro unto itself. 
|
|
|
11-16-2019, 05:07 AM
|
#6
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ychaouche
When can you say that a distro is based on another distro ?
And when does one distro diverge so much from the distro it branched off that it can no more be called a fork of it (or based on it) ?
|
It's a matter of discussion entirely.
Even the term distro is not properly defined, and the term "based on" isn't properly defined either.
FWIW, some people claim that Ubuntu is not based on Debian anymore because it has evolved so much that debian packages aren't compatible anymore.
But AFAIK Ubuntu still uses Debian as a base.
So, bikeshedding yee-haa!
|
|
|
11-16-2019, 10:45 AM
|
#7
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,296
|
Like so for me
Code:
harry@biker:~
$ cd /etc
harry@biker:/etc
$ ls
<snip>
harry@biker:/etc
$ cat lsb-release
PRETTY_NAME="antiX-19 Marielle Franco"
DISTRIB_ID=antiX
DISTRIB_RELEASE=19
DISTRIB_CODENAME=buster
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="antiX 19
harry@biker:/etc
$ cat debian_version
10.2
The cd /etc and the ls command will help you find thse files in terminal. cat command is to read the contents in the file.
Debian is a systemd default distro. We are not.
I won't answer diverge scenarios.
Last edited by rokytnji; 11-16-2019 at 10:48 AM.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|