LFS is *NOT* the most difficult at all
It is probably what takes the longest.
The documentation is so well written nothing bombed so far.
Compare that with Debian, Slackware, Gentoo
where installs can go wrong - because the documentation is not so extremely pedantically specific.
In LFS nothing is left to the user imagination.
Take Gentoo's Stage 1 -
where there is a hack to bootstrapping that is not documented.
if you dont do that - you end up getting gettext-something can't be installed.
(ok they may have fixed that)
Take Slackware - I tried installing it in the laptop - what now? It hangs
Oh maybe its because i have to issue some booting parameters? (or whatever)
In short I feel Gentoo, Slack, Debian - although extremely powerful are not any easier than LFS.
Of course while I am saying LFS is "easier"
take note I am million miles from having a full Desktop in place.
so I might change my opinion pretty soon!!
After LFS - there is BLFS which could well be very hard and arbitrary.
And after that there is you compiling your desktop manager of preference from scratch.
And all those applications from scratch ..
Ha! I bet that will be fun (not).
I should have done a lil more LFS today but there are so many steps each time
PLD <-- that is the
hardest distro of all
Get nvidia, win4lin and vmware working on that - and I shall build an altar in your homage !!