Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
02-02-2012, 12:39 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2011
Posts: 401
Rep: 
|
what is my distro
Hi
I am looking for a distro and I have following requirements;
1. It should be a full rolling distro.
2. It should be available in minimal iso which contains kernel along with basic system utilities but no gui or any desktop.
3. It should be an independent distro and not based on any other.
4. It should contain a package manager.
Can anyone tell me about a distro which fulfils this requirements?
Regards
|
|
|
02-02-2012, 12:43 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,667
|
Arch.
|
|
|
02-02-2012, 01:11 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Somewhere on the String
Distribution: Debian Wheezy (x86)
Posts: 6,094
|
Arch is good, as mentioned above. Debian testing or unstable are also essentially rolling distros, though Arch is probably a bit more bleeding edge. There's also aptosid (based on Debian unstable branch) and OpenSuse (only if you use the Tumbleweed repositories). And we can't forget Gentoo...
|
|
|
02-02-2012, 01:24 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 5,836
|
+1 for Arch in this particular situation.
|
|
|
02-03-2012, 06:11 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2011
Posts: 401
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Arch is good but its package manager is not as good as debian. For example, its package manager downloads very slow and also takes a lot of break between downloading every file, also it does not give the remaining time, is there any way to make arch's package manager more explanatory?
|
|
|
02-05-2012, 02:53 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Distribution: Mageia 7 - Debian 10 - Artix Linux
Posts: 1,142
|
I always find Sourcemage to be interesting when I have the time. There is crux Linux but not sure if its a complete rolling release.
Of course any of the others mention above also.
|
|
|
02-05-2012, 09:02 PM
|
#7
|
LQ Muse
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: A2 area Mi.
Posts: 17,709
|
if you want a rolling with a minimal install
then install Arch and NO desktop or use xfce
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|