LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-14-2007, 06:16 PM   #1
plesaleza
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Posts: 77

Rep: Reputation: 15
what Distros could i run?


i have a Dell Dimension v350 that has Pentium II, 13GB hard drive (not sure if that is a lot of space) 128MB for RAM. so far i've only really gotten a few distros to work (most LiveCDs work but i don't want to use a liveCD, i want to install) I've used Debian, Freespire, and those are the only two i've gotten to work well. what else can i get that doesn't have too many extra packages that i don't need, i don't need office anything. oh, and i don't like making too many discs for one thing because if i need more than one i can tell it's too large of a system. any good ideas would be appreciated
 
Old 08-14-2007, 06:38 PM   #2
manwichmakesameal
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 804

Rep: Reputation: 110Reputation: 110
How much do you know about Linux? You could go with Slackware. It's a very lightweight distro. Basically, try a whole bunch of 'em and keep the one(s) you like. I ended up with Slack. You could also try linuxfromscratch if you don't know much about Linux and have a whole bunch of time.
 
Old 08-14-2007, 06:41 PM   #3
thebouv
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Distribution: RHEL, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 64

Rep: Reputation: 16
Definitely don't suggest going the LFS route till you have some experience under your belt.

Distribution wise, try Ubuntu or Fedora.

As far as number of discs, you could always do a network install.

Good luck.
 
Old 08-14-2007, 06:46 PM   #4
plesaleza
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Posts: 77

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
i couldn't get Ubuntu to run, not eve start up, with that memory, would Fedora work (if there is a netinstall?)
 
Old 08-14-2007, 07:03 PM   #5
thebouv
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Distribution: RHEL, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 64

Rep: Reputation: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by plesaleza View Post
i couldn't get Ubuntu to run, not eve start up, with that memory, would Fedora work (if there is a netinstall?)
The biggest problem you're going to have with that much RAM is running a GUI like Gnome or KDE. But I've installed Linux on a machine with that little RAM and was able to use it, so you can too.

However, that's no guarantee that you'll get through the installation with ease. You mentioned the processor and RAM, but not the video card or other things, all of which could impede your installation.

When Ubuntu was on there, what do you mean it wouldn't start up? What type of errors were you getting?
 
Old 08-14-2007, 07:17 PM   #6
plesaleza
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Posts: 77

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebouv View Post
The biggest problem you're going to have with that much RAM is running a GUI like Gnome or KDE. But I've installed Linux on a machine with that little RAM and was able to use it, so you can too.

However, that's no guarantee that you'll get through the installation with ease. You mentioned the processor and RAM, but not the video card or other things, all of which could impede your installation.

When Ubuntu was on there, what do you mean it wouldn't start up? What type of errors were you getting?
well i've used Gnome with Debian, and i believe KDE with Freespire...

I couldn't even get Ubuntu to start up, and that's exactly what i mean, start up. i think it got stuck loading. all i know is that audio/sound is integrated (or something liek that) and video is probably the same. (the left side of my computer is removed, so i can easily look in, and don't worry if that isn't a good thing, i'm just making use of an old computer, i don't need to.)

what, besides debian, can be done netinstall?

Last edited by plesaleza; 08-14-2007 at 07:18 PM.
 
Old 08-14-2007, 07:24 PM   #7
thebouv
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Distribution: RHEL, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 64

Rep: Reputation: 16
Heh, I ran plenty a box with the sides off the case. Keep the dust out with a cleaning every once in a while and you're good to go.

Fedora can be done via net install. The Fedora Live CD also has an "Install to Hard Disk" menu option as well.
 
Old 08-14-2007, 07:27 PM   #8
plesaleza
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Posts: 77

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
anyone have a link to show me how to do a net install of fedora (whatever the most recent one is would be best, i think) this probably is useless but i have a zip drive and also a floppy drive, i know it's probably common, but if there was any way i could make use of them that could be good (not a floppy install.)
 
Old 08-18-2007, 01:29 AM   #9
benali72
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Posts: 32

Rep: Reputation: 0
For a P-II with 128M memory, I would suggest Damn Small Linux (www.damnsmalllinux.org) or Puppy Linux (www.puppylinux.com). They will both work for sure (I've done what you're trying to do).

Maybe you could get Ubuntu or Red Hat to work, but if you do you're pretty sharp.... these are too big and bloated for a P-II at 128M... focus on "small distros" for success.

Good luck.
 
Old 08-18-2007, 01:39 AM   #10
benali72
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Posts: 32

Rep: Reputation: 0
I forgot to add-- DSL will run totally in memory at 128M, Puppy requires more. If you can max out your memory (probably for about $20 for a used memory stick online or from a computer show), you greatly increase responsiveness on a P-II because Linuxes like DSL or Puppy will then run entirely from memory.
 
Old 08-18-2007, 12:28 PM   #11
weirdwolf
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Location: 1 AU from a G2V star
Distribution: PCLinuxOS LXDE / Android
Posts: 247

Rep: Reputation: 434Reputation: 434Reputation: 434Reputation: 434Reputation: 434
DSL(3.1) ran great on my old box (a 350k6 w/128mb mem. ran as Live only) used Fluxbox natively plus has JWM as well if you want it. uses a 2.4.something kernel if that matters to you. After install it's said to become basically "Debian" (never did it yet), tried Puppy awhile back (more than a year) and don't really remember it much ,sorry. the newer Puppy looks nice from what I can tell, I do remember it was a little more user friendly than DSL with more options for customizing it. It seems that in DSL if your scroll wheel mouse works , then lucky you, it worked in 3.1 but didn't work in 3.4 when I tried it (it's those little things that p*ss me off) with no settings for your mouse available from the desktop. DSL-N seems to be dead in the water http://damnsmalllinux.org/cgi-bin/fo...T;f=37;t=18802 have used 0.1rc4 and it looked ok but needed some work still, had a 2.6 kernel and Seamonkey instead of Firefox. DSL is up to 4.0rc1.
Download both and use them as Live to see which looks/suits your needs best. Neither needs more than 128mb memory.

from the Puppy site

Advantages of Puppy Linux:

* Extremely friendly, familiar and fun for those new to Linux
* Puppy 'just works' with less hassle
* Puppy boots up and runs fast in RAM memory, freeing any CD boot drive
* Puppy will boot from a minimum PC with 586Mhz CPU and 32Mb RAM
* Booting from a CD/ROM takes under 30 seconds
* Puppy will easily install to USB, Zip or hard drive media
* Puppy can run your operating system, programs and store your data on the same CD-RW
* Puppy comes with all the applications needed for daily use
* Puppy minimises USB writes to extend boot Flash devices life indefinitely
* Puppy contains extensive help files for ALL its programs
* Puppy boots right into the desktop without user passwords
* Puppy has lots of different versions
HTH
 
Old 08-18-2007, 12:46 PM   #12
alred
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: singapore
Distribution: puppy and Ubuntu and ... erh ... redhat(sort of) :( ... + the venerable bsd and solaris ^_^
Posts: 658
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 31
>> "Maybe you could get Ubuntu or Red Hat to work, but if you do you're pretty sharp.... these are too big and bloated for a P-II at 128M... focus on "small distros" for success."

not neccessary ... if you ran ubuntu and redhat on a p2 with 128mb of ram ... you still can run them well in icewm and blackbox ... but you have to be patient with things like oo and firefox , or you can increase the ram if thats possible ... this will force you into a habit of looking for another way of running things with whatever things you are holding ...

infact if you are serious in running linux with that kind of machine for desktop use i believe you can do that with any distro that you mentioned ... not only ubuntu or redhat ...


//mine currently are on a p3 with 512 ram ...


.
 
Old 08-18-2007, 04:32 PM   #13
IndyGunFreak
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Indpls
Distribution: Laptops: Debian Jessie XFCE, NAS: OpenMediaVault 3.0
Posts: 1,355

Rep: Reputation: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by plesaleza View Post
well i've used Gnome with Debian, and i believe KDE with Freespire...

I couldn't even get Ubuntu to start up, and that's exactly what i mean, start up. i think it got stuck loading. all i know is that audio/sound is integrated (or something liek that) and video is probably the same. (the left side of my computer is removed, so i can easily look in, and don't worry if that isn't a good thing, i'm just making use of an old computer, i don't need to.)

what, besides debian, can be done netinstall?
I think you're on the right track with Debian. I hate RPM based distros(Redhat), but if I were goin to use one, it would be Fedora. I am a big fan of almost anything Debian. If you really want to test your patience, Slackware would probably scream on that machine. I'd have my head kicked in by a rhino before I used anything that ended in *Spire

*I* would run either Debian Etch XFCE, or Xubuntu. As for your booting problems with Ubuntu, its not uncommon to have trouble with Ubuntu's live CDs, so just download the text based "Alternate Install CD", and it will generally get you past any problems and get the OS installed. FWIW though, you don't have enough RAM to run the Live CD, so its not surprising you're having that issue... Read the install options on the link below, and pay attention to the system requirements.

http://ubuntu-releases.cs.umn.edu/7.04/

Both Debian Etch XFCE and Xubuntu use the Xfce environment, which will help with your ram limitations. A friend of mine is pretty high on Sidux linux. I'm not familiar with it, but it is apparently based on Debian. I'm not even sure what version its based on. If you've got the live Install of Debian, you should be able to install from that CD if you wish....

http://www.xubuntu.org
http://www.debian.org

Good luck

IGF

Last edited by IndyGunFreak; 08-18-2007 at 04:36 PM.
 
Old 08-18-2007, 11:12 PM   #14
weirdwolf
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Location: 1 AU from a G2V star
Distribution: PCLinuxOS LXDE / Android
Posts: 247

Rep: Reputation: 434Reputation: 434Reputation: 434Reputation: 434Reputation: 434
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyGunFreak View Post
A friend of mine is pretty high on Sidux linux. I'm not familiar with it, but it is apparently based on Debian. I'm not even sure what version its based on. If you've got the live Install of Debian, you should be able to install from that CD if you wish....
IGF
Sidux is based on Debian Sid (unstable)
Quote:
sidux is an operating system based on the Linux kernel, Debian's most modern branch (called "Sid") and many free and open source applications.
http://sidux.com/
Stefans departure from Kanotix is why Kanotix is basically stalled at this time( ya gotta follow your beliefs ). I've thought about it (Sidux) but so far thats about it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidux

Last edited by weirdwolf; 08-18-2007 at 11:17 PM.
 
Old 08-19-2007, 12:00 AM   #15
jacook
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Townsville, Australia
Distribution: PCLinuxOS .93 Junior
Posts: 437

Rep: Reputation: 30
Distros for older Hardware:

Vector Linux
http://www.vectorlinux.com/

DSL
http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/

Puppy Linux
http://www.puppylinux.org/user/viewpage.php?page_id=3

Slackware
http://www.slackware.com/

BeaFanatIX
http://bea.cabarel.com/

Elive:
http://www.elivecd.org/

Luit Linux
http://luitlinux.sarovar.org/

you can find more here

http://www.linuxlinks.com/Distributi...Distributions/
http://www.linuxlinks.com/Distributions/Floppy/
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: See distros. See distros run. Run, distros, run. LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-13-2006 01:24 AM
Does Lindows already loaded = would run most distros toastermaker Linux - Laptop and Netbook 2 01-02-2005 07:06 PM
Screw it, I'm going to run 3 Distros, any help? SonoranFun Linux - Distributions 3 12-03-2004 04:37 AM
How many distros do you run on your box? kodon General 8 09-24-2004 01:36 PM
Most distros will not run on a Pentium IV jeremy Linux - General 3 12-13-2000 08:14 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration