Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: SUSE 9.1 Pro and Debian Testing on Server
Posts: 469
Rep:
sources.list for ubuntu
Hey, does anyone have any good sources.list files for Ubuntu GNU/Linux, the packages they provide are utterly horrible. Things like gtk-devel and libpng are missing. I think the Ubuntu people rushed this one a little too fast by calling it a final version....I thought Red Hat was bad when installing RPMs but christ, half the stuff I try to install in this thing doesn't work. Anyways, any help would be appreciated.
Distribution: SUSE 9.1 Pro and Debian Testing on Server
Posts: 469
Original Poster
Rep:
I tried that....didnt work too well, I backed out before I broke the system and removed the packages from it...they caused problems or else just wouldnt install. Ubuntu's people also advised against it.
Distribution: SUSE 9.1 Pro and Debian Testing on Server
Posts: 469
Original Poster
Rep:
Xandros and Linspire both have the same problem. Anyways...ive compiled most of it from source now...lol, i got tired of trying to figure it out...they are still fairly new...by the time they reach their second reach they'll probably have made it a lot better. Anyways, thanks for your help. ttyl.
## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from the 'universe'
## repository.
## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to
## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in
## universe WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu security
## team.
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ warty universe
deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ warty universe
Originally posted by rm6990 Hey, does anyone have any good sources.list files for Ubuntu GNU/Linux, the packages they provide are utterly horrible.
The best sources list is the one that is installed. Make sure to uncomment the lines for security, main and universe. The only repo you might safely add is Marillat (for none-free multimedia stuff) since it mainly contains stuff that isn't in Ubuntu. I have yet to install a broken package.
Originally posted by rm6990 Things like gtk-devel and libpng are missing. I think the Ubuntu people rushed this one a little too fast by calling it a final version....I thought Red Hat was bad when installing RPMs but christ, half the stuff I try to install in this thing doesn't work. Anyways, any help would be appreciated.
I have libpng10 and libpng12. libgtk2.0-dev is available in main.
Try searching (doing it in synaptic works fine) for the stuff you need. Use keywords like png, gtk and dev rather than names that other distros use. If you try to install a package without knowing it's name the fact that the package version sometimes is included in the name will cause problems (it's done so that multiple versions of the same package can be provided).
If you can't find the packages listed above (assuming that you have a full install and have enabled the Ubuntu repositories and updated your apt database) your install probably went awry. If that is the case I would checking your install media as a first step.
Quote:
Originally posted by ToniT Well, (from a my/debian point of view) they are doing something wrong then.
Anyways, fixing many enough (all?) packages, you will eventually have a working system.
First of all: Do not mix Debian and Ubuntu repositories. Ubuntu was frozen from Debian unstable in June or July. The packages have been bug-fixed and patched ever since. Library mismatch is not funny. Don't go there.
Now talking about the wider perspective it is good that Ubuntu uses their own repositories. If the didn't they would have to rely on trying to force in the changes they want in Debian. Ubuntu and Debian have different release philosophies. Both fill their own niches. Several of the Ubuntu developers maintain Debian packages, it seems to me they should be in a good position to take a smart decision on this. Patches are provided back to the Debian folks to pick and choose from. It seems like a solid approach to me.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.