Latest LQ Deal: Complete CCNA, CCNP & Red Hat Certification Training Bundle
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.


  Search this Thread
Old 01-14-2013, 03:38 PM   #1
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2012
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 22

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Source Mage

I've already read the differences between Gentoo and Mage, the reason why I'm considering it over Gentoo is because of local configs vs global configs, I don't want to link some packages to a package I need and more or less a useless dependency no doubt and that's why I prefer local.

And because packages install similarly to FreeBSD's ports well on the outside anyway.

There's also Lunar Linux as well and I've never truly gave slackware a go but gentoo is getting pretty bloated and that's just when you chroot into your system for the first time, let's not forget what goes on top like nvidia-drivers and xorg-server.

But this is also a gray area as source mage looks to be a liveDVD that allows you to install now I'm actually just downloading it now so I can't comment if it's a stage 3 or a stage1-3.

Old 01-15-2013, 01:50 AM   #2
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 222

Rep: Reputation: 52
Once upon a time I used Source Mage quite heavily and I liked it a lot but nowadays I see no point in compiling my own software and therefore moved away from it. I still like a complete control over my box though so I use Slackware.
Old 01-15-2013, 12:54 PM   #3
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2012
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 22

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
There's still benefits for compiling your own software, but almost every package these days or at least a majority are compiled for x86_64, the kde team at least a few devs compile using an i7 and an i5.
Performance wise.. unless you have crazy hardware (up to 64GB and a 6 core) I see no difference between binary(using arch as an example) or source based(gentoo as an example)
For server's I would use a distro like Gentoo but for my own personal desktop I see no reason anymore, as back in the old days it made a lot of sense to compile as it optimizes for your hardware and still true today but the performance gains are minimal when your PC has crazy specs.

That's why I'm also looking at slack, main reason looking at source mage was because of the install times, I probably won't see speed increases between sorcery or portage compiling the packages though but the 30 minute install intrigued me.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
help installing source mage Shadowfax404 Linux - Newbie 4 10-30-2012 12:42 PM
Source Mage GNU/Linux ktek Linux - Distributions 3 10-02-2008 07:38 PM
Gentoo or Source Mage linuxbriel Linux - Distributions 3 08-27-2006 10:36 PM
source mage install ahunderwood5850 Linux - Newbie 1 10-26-2003 05:00 PM
Anyone tried source mage? contrasutra Linux - Distributions 6 10-06-2003 04:19 AM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration