LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-02-2004, 06:30 PM   #1
JPPLAY
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: 0
Red Hat vs Slackware


I want to know the plus and negatives for Red Hat vs Slackware. I used Red Hat before but in GUI. Know I want to use linux only in prompt mode. No graphics for me mainly. I may want to use gui from time to time. I would be using the distrobution to learn about installing security running it etc. I would just be using it to learn all about linux. I will be doing programming on it c, c+, perl etc. What would you suggest.
 
Old 02-02-2004, 06:34 PM   #2
Joey.Dale
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Tampa, Fl
Distribution: Gentoo, Slackware
Posts: 828

Rep: Reputation: 39
Slackware: light, fast, stable
RedHat: none of the above
 
Old 02-02-2004, 09:20 PM   #3
JPPLAY
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 10

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
More info would be great.
 
Old 02-02-2004, 09:23 PM   #4
DrOzz
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 4,185

Rep: Reputation: 60
well you say you only want to use the distro in text mode, so does it really matter what distro you do use?
there is only going to be very minor differences (some none) with some distros when comparing them text based ...
but outta the two i will sugget slack, just to answer you ..
 
Old 02-02-2004, 09:25 PM   #5
JPPLAY
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 10

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
What the difference if I don't only use text mode?
 
Old 02-02-2004, 09:53 PM   #6
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Well, if you want CLI, a default Slack install defaults to runlevel 3 and a command line. RH doesn't. Sure, it's easy to switch either one around but I still think that says something. I have never used RH and never will, so I can't really say, but screwy directories, patched binaries, specialized RH-specific tools, an emphasis on big business and graphics - none of these things would be useful to you. A lot of pointless overhead to strip away and work around. Slack is much more basic and generic. While it has pkgtool and allied tools, compiling is basically expected. I do it from a user-standpoint but the same things would apply for a programmer trying to develop and compile his own applications, I'd expect. Also, I suspect Slackware is a lot easier to customize to your needs and is designed to be customized with a text editor from the command line - or at least from a text editor. I gather RH expects configuration to be done from a 'control panel' in a GUI. And there's probably quite a lot of layers of configs and non-standard gotchas to deal with. Slack's 'just the files' and has few surprises.

Besides, it's just a great distro for any purpose. It seems most developers use Debian, Slack, Gentoo, etc. For CLI, learning Linux, programming... yeah, I wouldn't see RH for that. Slack's the ticket.

That being said, you can do anything with any Linux. Just that with Slack there are probably the least impediments to doing what you want.

-- Musta forgot to hit refresh. I missed the last posts. Slack is not at all deficient when it comes to the GUI. It runs all the wm's and IDE's like anybody else. Handling .xinitrc with xwmconfig or substituting your own like I sorta did is easy. Reconfiguring to runlevel 4 (runlevel 5 on RH) is no trouble, though I don't see why people do that. Like I say, any distro *can* do most anything.

Last edited by slakmagik; 02-02-2004 at 09:56 PM.
 
Old 02-03-2004, 07:28 AM   #7
Skitzo
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Beyond the third Van-Allen belt
Distribution: Slackware,Gentoo
Posts: 25

Rep: Reputation: 15
Red Hat - Point and click.
Slackware - Take over the world inside your computer (and possibly beyond).

Red Hat - Stay here and use the many functions and advances of Linux.
-- or --
Slackware - See just how far the rabbit hole goes.

cheesy post isn't it >;]
 
Old 02-03-2004, 04:52 PM   #8
MasterC
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu
Posts: 12,612

Rep: Reputation: 69
Moving to Linux - Distributions where distro question go

Cool
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bad EIP value installing Mandrake 9.2, Red Hat 9 or Slackware 9.1 djeddiej Linux - Newbie 8 11-13-2004 05:37 PM
Can't get CUPS to rock in Red Hat, works flawless in Slackware ni0wn Linux - Software 2 11-12-2004 03:35 AM
How can i install Slackware after Red Hat? Harp00 Linux - Newbie 8 08-28-2003 12:31 AM
Slackware 9.0 or Red Hat 9.0? Underworld Slackware 6 08-19-2003 04:20 AM
Slackware 9.0 compared to Red Hat 9.0? Underworld Linux - Distributions 5 07-19-2003 08:18 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration