Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
12-16-2017, 03:47 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2017
Posts: 4
Rep: 
|
Picking a desktop distro to get started with on a laptop.
I'm not current on desktop Linux. I do have some old experience on Unix and Red Hat.
I'm looking to narrow down the huge field of distro's to 2 or 3 to try out. This is a bit long as I'll help you get to know me.
I have a HP 4530 laptop, 8gb, i7 CPU with an ATI video card.
Non-negotiable requirements: Not being spied on, not being constantly nagged to upload usage data to somewhere or having patches pushed to me without my consent.
My primary applications are IMAP email, web browsing, Skype, playing audio and video files. Apps currently favored by me are Firefox, Opera and VLC. I am looking for a replacement for Outlook 2012, maybe Thunderbird?
I tend to like simple packages that do one thing well and are stable. I guess that means I don't mind doing some tweaking and hunting down packages that meet my specific needs.
Conversely, I don't tend to like suites of applications, but if they do one thing well without getting too enthused about themselves, like Word and Excel used to, that's OK.
Thank you for your help.
|
|
|
12-16-2017, 05:33 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Apr 2010
Location: Continental USA
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, RedHat, DSL, Puppy, CentOS, Knoppix, Mint-DE, Sparky, VSIDO, tinycore, Q4OS, Manjaro
Posts: 6,199
|
I am currently running Q4OS Linux on an older and less powerful HP laptop than yours. I run everything you mentioned except SKYPE. (SKYPE on Linux is painful since Microsoft took it over!)
I have run SPARKY Linux, Mint-DE, Mint, and VSIDO in the past on my HP laptop and can recommend Mint for your purposes. (Mint-DE is a bit better for mine.) All of them are quite capable. I would not run Ubuntu, or anything very KDE based due to the slowdown in video that can result: the desktop software itself is fast enough but it comes with too much "baggage".
Elementary Linux might also serve you well.
There are Live-CD images available for ALL of these. I use Easy2Boot (E2B) to load them all up on a USB thumb drive that I can then boot into whatever I want to test this day without actually installing. Try before you jump in with both feet.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
12-16-2017, 05:39 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2017
Location: @127.0.0.1
Distribution: Mint, Void, MX, Haiku, PMOS, Plasma Mobile, and many others
Posts: 1,258
|
I second the Linux Mint Recommendation, it should run no problem on that hardware! I'd go with cinnamon Desktop as many people who are used to Windows find it easy to use.
The easiest way to find out which is for you just create a live usb or CD and boot.
Have Fun!
|
|
|
12-16-2017, 08:34 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,937
|
I quite like Mint, but I would suggest that you also look at Mageia and perhaps OpenSUSE. There is, of course, always Slackware--I always have at least one Slackware box.
You might try booting to Live CDs of the distros you're interested in after you've narrowed your search and taking them for test drives, then picking the one you are most comfortable with.
|
|
|
12-16-2017, 08:49 PM
|
#5
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, EndeavourOS, OpenSUSE, KDE Neon
Posts: 4,030
|
ANYTHING will run well on that machine form a cpu/memory perspective. The heaviest DE with the heaviest suites on it will still run great. So from a resources side, there's nothing that machine can't handle easily.
From a what delivers what you want, here's my take:
1. Slackware. NOt my favorite, I dislike using it. But it's one of the best for setting up EXACTLY the way you want with nothing extra, and it will do only what you tell it. There's a reason it's the oldest existing linux distribution. It follows that unix philosophy of keeping it simple.
2. Debian. There's a TON of distro's based on it. IT can be installed as a netinstall and built so only what you want is installed (this is the way I do my installs). It's got the largest repos so there's absolutely tons of software. It's well tested and exceedingly stable if you stay with the stable distribution. If you don't mind a little more installation time, I really prefer base Debian over all the "beginner" distro's (mint, ubuntu, Mageia) that install everything and the kitchen sink by default, even if they do install it with a lighter weight desktop for performance.
3. Arch. Bleeding edge (the bad), but AMAZING documentation (seriously, the Arch Wiki is often referenced even by OTHER distro's for how to get things to work, it's that good), can be installed to be exactly what you want, and if you add in the AUR (Arch User Repository) has repos that rival Debian for quantity of packages.
Side note: for email, if you're looking to replace outlook, Evolution is going to be much more what you're looking for than Thunderbird. Thunderbird works well, but development on it is basically nil at this point, and Evolution is capable of being much more advanced, although it is a bit more work to set up (I personally actually do use Thunderbird, but I only needed VERY basic functionality).
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
12-17-2017, 11:22 AM
|
#6
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: PCLinuxOS, Salix
Posts: 6,251
|
My choice for email is Claws-mail; it's straight-forward but adaptable.
A lot depends on your choice of desktop. KDE may feel a bit over the top on eye-candy and Gnome makes your computer look as if it's turned into a phone.
Mint Mate is a good plain distro that no-one really dislikes. Also, I think you might like Salix. That's Slackware with lots more ready-to-run software and added user-friendliness. Look at the manuals and try the live media before you install.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
12-18-2017, 07:24 AM
|
#7
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Upper Hale, Surrey/Hants Border, UK
Distribution: One main distro, & some smaller ones casually.
Posts: 5,893
Rep: 
|
You may like to take a look at AntiX, (especially the 'base' version).
http://antix.mepis.org/index.php?title=Main_Page
|
|
|
12-18-2017, 11:55 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2012
Location: Sebastopol, CA
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 1,041
|
For a more Windows-like experience, and for the latest up-to-date video codecs (for watching movies), Mint Linux is the go-to desktop distribution.
Since you have some older UNIX and Linux experience, you also might want to try Slackware, as you might find some things about it more familiar to you. Slackware keeps its packages up-to-date, but doesn't hide the underlying system under menus and graphical wizards.
Linux in general has gotten a lot better than it was, in many ways (for instance, X11 and audio will JFW on most hardware, without any need for configuration). I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
12-30-2017, 10:49 AM
|
#9
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2017
Posts: 4
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Thank you for your feedback. I have now have a different list to try than I'd developed from forum browsing. Thanks again.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|