Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Is there a Linux distro meant to cater to digital photography? I have a copy of GrafPup but I am not too keen on it. I have done a ton of searching and the best I've found is Ubuntu Studio. I was considering using a fully-customizable distro like Lunar Linux and making a light, snappy photo processing machine, but I don't think I am skilled or knowledgeable enough to accomplish much with Lunar. Any suggestions? I really want to be able to run Bibble, blueMarine, or Lightzone with normal speed (my machine is a pentium III, so it's slow in Ubuntu) and dedicate my machine to this task.
It sounds like all you need to do is install a relatively lean configuration of Debian (say, using FluxBox for very low overhead). You can get the ease of installation you have in Ubuntu, but without all the bloat.
In the same vein, you could just use Xubuntu as well, or use a lighter VM in Ubuntu and disable things you don't need.
I was considering either normal Ubuntu with fluxbox or going with fluxbuntu but I don't know how well-supported it is. their website doesn't exactly inspire me to jump on their bandwagon...
I unfortunately can't afford much in the way of a graphics card at the moment so I scraped together 500M of RAM and a couple gigs of swap partition in the hopes of helping it along. So I guess I'll go in the direction of lightweight window managers.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.