Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
07-02-2005, 08:06 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: Windows XP Home, Ubuntu Hoary
Posts: 584
Rep:
|
Nice Small Linux Distro
Hey all.
OK, I need a really light weight distro for a really old computer.
This is the hardware specs
Pentium MMX 166 MHz
64 MB of RAM
I want a distro that:
-Doesn't use KDE or Gnome (something like FVWM or XFCE might be nice, although I think even XFCE is too bloated for this comp)
-includes gcc (no, i dont expect to do any major compiling on this old computer, but if u read the kernel part ull see why i need it)
-has kernel headers available
-runs kernel 2.4 (I have an external SMC network card that supports Linux 2.4.x but the module needs to be compiled)
Is there a distro that includes all of that or else where I can easily download the packages from my main computer?
NOTE : if you know how to get the kernel headers and gcc installed on Puppy-mozilla 1.0.3 that would be even better!
|
|
|
07-02-2005, 09:07 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Michigan USA
Distribution: Mandrake, DamnSmallLinux, VectorLinux
Posts: 416
Rep:
|
Damn Small Linux has an install script.
|
|
|
07-02-2005, 11:18 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: Windows XP Home, Ubuntu Hoary
Posts: 584
Original Poster
Rep:
|
OK, a couple more things. I loaded Knoppix 3.9 in text mode on the machine to work with some partitions, and just to see, i typed ifconfig. it appears rtl8150 (the kernel module that is used for SMC's USB to Ethernet Adapter) comes out of the box with kernel 2.6. So a minimalist distro with kernel 2.6 would be best. I am going to give Puppy a shot again, and try using modprobe rtl8150 to see if it supports my USB ethernet card, but I doubt it will out of the box because it uses kernel 2.4, and doesn't come with a compiler so i cant compile the kernel module
Lol, this is too much work
|
|
|
07-02-2005, 12:01 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: Slackware,Arch
Posts: 389
Rep:
|
u can try crux, slackware (minimal install), Arch...etc...the bottom line just install whatever u want..
|
|
|
07-02-2005, 05:00 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: Windows XP Home, Ubuntu Hoary
Posts: 584
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I have noticed that a lot of distros, however, feel very sluggish, even at the command line. for instance, suse 9.3 feels more sluggish at the command line than puppy feels with a gui. I was looking for more of a minimalist 2.6 distro. Most of the minimalist distros out there right now run on kernel 2.2 or kernel 2.4.
Slackware kind of scares me. Is it true you have to go through and upgrade each package by hand?
|
|
|
07-03-2005, 02:54 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: Slackware,Arch
Posts: 389
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by linux-rulz
Slackware kind of scares me. Is it true you have to go through and upgrade each package by hand?
|
there are third party software for automatic download & upgrade namely swaret & slapt-get(i'm using slapt-get)..
crux using ports where u download the source from developer page & compile it... but crux is optimize for i686 ( so do Arch)....
|
|
|
07-03-2005, 05:27 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,545
Rep:
|
Give Arch a shot, don't be scared by it's i686 requirement, the P-MMX scrapes in just nicely. A base install (recommended) just gives you your CLI and not a lot else, then you use pacman (package manager) to install what you want from there. Installation give you the option of both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels and should cover everything you need.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|