Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
11-02-2001, 08:44 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 161
Rep:
|
Newbie - which Distro?
Hi Guys,
I want to get out of MS hell!
I'm looking for a cheep, secure OS to run a file, intranet and e-mail server for my home network - a couple of PCs running Win95. I currently use an old copy of NT4 and lots of glue on an i486DX4 box. Networking is 100Tx with a 56K modem on my Win95 workstation.
I have some Unix sys admin experience (Version 6, 7, SVR2/3/4 and HPUX) and would love to return to the Unix fold.
The OS will need to run a server (no monitor or keyboard) and act as a development platform for things like LDAP, IMAP, Kerberos, web server etc. When I replace my workstation (PII, 333MHz), I will also want to use the oldest box as an internet firewall, so security and stability are a must. I will need to support at least one Win95 laptop on the network for some time.
Could you reccomend a suitable Linux distribution?
|
|
|
11-03-2001, 11:04 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Off the coast of Madadascar
Posts: 498
Rep:
|
RedHat
Although this is a biased opinion, I suggest RedHat.
I use it as a firewall, (downlaod Iridium)
File Server, local Web server.
Secure, and easy to use. I never had a problem.
Development tools included. C/C++,Fortran(I think)
Runs nicely on Pentium2 350, your specs are perfectly fine.
Lots of fun to have.
|
|
|
11-03-2001, 12:06 PM
|
#3
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417
|
why does this question get asked EVERY single day? why can't people just search the forum..
either way, i'm bored... so:
get mandrake, it's aimed at newbies. And basically does everythign redhat does, but goes further to make it look less painful than it actually is. very little in it tho. Mandrake does have important newbie features like automatic dependecy instalation in rpmdrake
|
|
|
11-03-2001, 02:30 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,700
Rep:
|
What to use...
With HPUX experience, you might want to go for something less user-friendly. Slackware prides itself on its stability, being the most unix-like distro, and I'm also certain its one of the easiest distros for older hardware. Then again, you might want to go Debian. It installs very slim, and apt is their brilliant little utility to install or upgrade packages.
This isn't really a complaint, but lately I just keep finding that now matter how much I play with the menus on install, Redhat and Mandrake just load a ton of stuff. This really is just a matter of preference though, mostly arrising from the fact that I have five machines that are pre-PII and don't have a whole lot of disk.
Either way, good luck, you're in for a lot of fun.
-Finegan
|
|
|
11-03-2001, 04:36 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2001
Distribution: red hat 7
Posts: 58
Rep:
|
yeah i'd go with tarballedtux. if u've got some unix experience then it should be a breeze.
|
|
|
11-03-2001, 08:59 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 161
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks guys
Thanks for the advice!
I guess the question gets asked by newbies 'cos we're new and we all want something just a little different.
I think I'll dip my toes in the water with Red Hat first, just to get the hang of Linux, then try out some of the other offerings.
Thanks again,
DaveG
|
|
|
11-06-2001, 06:19 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Wa. State
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,261
Rep:
|
Isn't Slack the only distro out anymore?
What's this mandrake, debian stuff.... LOL
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|