Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
11-09-2004, 11:42 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 7
Rep:
|
Recommend me a (SATA-Friendly) Distro
Recently I decided to give Linux a try again. I have an Abit NF7-S Rev. 2 motherboard, two SATA hard drives, a gig of ram, and an AMD mobile 2400+ (which is overclocked a bit). I would like to install Linux on one of the SATA drives.
Here are my requirements/desires:
1. Very SATA-friendly. Since I am new, I would like to be able to get it working without jumping through 50 different hoops.
2. A clean install with a MINIMUM of extra programs pre-installed.
3. Near-cutting edge (or) tried and true...recommendations here? I could go either way...
4. SPEED. 
5. A fairly simple/easy install please since I am a newb; however, I am a comp-sci grad who has worked with computers for 14 years, so...
6. Actively being developed.
That said, I am mainly considering Slackware and Yoper. One is tried and true, the other new, fast, and exciting. I'll admit, my main concern is getting it on a SATA drive without too much fuss. I am leaning toward slack, but aren't there SATA issues with it? Any recommendations?
Edit: Vectorlinux was a consideration as well, though I've heard less about this distro.
Last edited by anitract; 11-10-2004 at 09:34 AM.
|
|
|
11-11-2004, 07:12 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I guess I won't have to worry about having too many recommendations to choose from. ^_^
Well, I am still debating what to do. The more research I do the more pissed I get that I didn't just buy an IDE drive for linux instead of an extra SATA drive.
|
|
|
11-11-2004, 08:10 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Ultima, Blag, KateOS, PCLinuxOS, Frugalware
Posts: 216
Rep:
|
Well, support for SATA is more a matter of the kernel than a distro as such - if it is built into the kernel, it will be supported. Personally I stay away from SATA for now, because I know the good rule of thumb when it comes to hardware is to wait at least a year or so after it becomes popular on Windows. I might move to SATA in a year... But if you want it now, just look for the most recent releases from the larger distros. Suse or Mandrake are a good bet, but Yoper is worth trying (I use Yoper myself, but not on SATA).
Really, the simplest thing to do for now is to stick to PATA. In some areas in life it pays to be an early adopter, but not in computing, and certainly not in computing on Linux!
|
|
|
11-12-2004, 09:18 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Yeah, I hear ya about the early adopting. SATA is pretty sweet in general, at least on XP, so it should rock on Linux (in theory). I googled a bunch last night on Linux and SATA and understand it much better now...right on about the kernal.
This site explained it all very well to me: http://www.linuxmafia.com/faq/Hardware/sata.html
Looks like I am going to have to switch my Mobo to legacy mode (effectively having my sata drives emulated as ata drives), install linux, then build a custom kernel w/ support for my SATA hardware (Silicon Image 3112), then switch out of legacy and back to SATA/regular mode. It seems like I will be using the libata driver in my custom kernel...somehow.
Right now, the custom kernel scares me a bit because I am a complete linux newbie. Does anyone know of a site with a walk-through of how to do this?
|
|
|
11-12-2004, 03:02 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Ultima, Blag, KateOS, PCLinuxOS, Frugalware
Posts: 216
Rep:
|
well there are a lot of generic guides on compiling a kernel, including one right here on Linuxquestions.org. But I would suggest deciding which distro you're going to use and then googling for instructions specific for your distro. You can also then search their own forums for some hints and instructions... The generic way should work on every distro, but some provide a bit of assistance that makes the process a bit easier, so you might as well take advantage of it. Make sure you're looking at instructions for 2.6 kernels, not the older 2.4 - configuration is quite different.
I would suggest having a go with Mandrake - it's not my favourite distro in general, but as a rule they do have a pretty good support for 'cutting edge' hardware, and they have a large community to draw information from.
Good luck 
Last edited by ferrix; 11-12-2004 at 03:09 PM.
|
|
|
11-13-2004, 12:05 PM
|
#6
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for the tips. Mandrake was the distro I tried a couple of years ago when I first tried linux...wasn't too impressed, so I think I'll try something different. I think I am going to try out Slackware, so now I just need to hunt down some info on compiling a kernel for it like you suggested.
|
|
|
11-13-2004, 02:20 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Ultima, Blag, KateOS, PCLinuxOS, Frugalware
Posts: 216
Rep:
|
Well, I would never dare to say anything against Slackware  You won't have to search far for info - just head over to Slackware forum here and you'll find a guide to compiling 2.6 kernels right at the top. You probably found it already 
|
|
|
11-14-2004, 04:36 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 37
Rep:
|
i think you should go with mepis. it is debian based (which is a huge plus to me over rpm distros) and it's hardware detection is beautiful. Plus it's a LiveCD so you can in essence try before you "buy". It's also a cinch to install.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|