Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
03-07-2019, 04:46 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2019
Posts: 2
Rep: 
|
Maximum version of gblic supported by Redhat 5
Hi All,
I have a build box that is based on the redhat5 version (before fedora and centos) and uses glibc 2.5. Right now, I have a need to update glibc as well as redhat version, but cannot do both as I need to have a base minimum version to support all flavors of linux as well as multiple OS versions.
I am unable to find a repository for the supported versions of glibc for redhat 5. Can one of you please help me?
TIA,
PR
|
|
|
03-07-2019, 07:53 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 17,552
|
I would go back to the drawing board. I presume you mean RHEL 5
Glibc, kernel headers, & gcc form the toolchain in any system. RHEL is very old (kernel-2.6.xx?). There have been major reorganisations. Many features were backported, but there's a limit, especially if you can't write your own extremely clever patches. RHEL 5 is surely EOL, and you have evidently become acquainted with that fact. My firm advice is to upgrade.
|
|
|
03-07-2019, 08:03 AM
|
#3
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian/ubuntu/suse ...
Posts: 24,271
|
glibc belongs to the system, so it is actually installed together with the os. Usually you are not allowed to replace the "official" lib, but obviously there can be patches. I don't know how can you get any related info for RH5.
|
|
|
03-07-2019, 10:01 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2019
Posts: 2
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Maximum version of glibc supported by RedHat 5
Thanks for the response "business_kid" and "pan64". To further clarify, no this is not RHEL 5. This is plain RH5 which was before the EL started coming out. I know I need to upgrade, but want to do it in a way that I can continue to have the benefit of the min version of glibc used so that backward compatibility allows me to not worry about different linux distros.
Will try to do more research.
-PR
|
|
|
03-08-2019, 01:11 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian/ubuntu/suse ...
Posts: 24,271
|
libc is usually backward compatible, I do not really understand what do you want to achieve.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|