LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Linux - Distributions (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-distributions-5/)
-   -   Mandrake 9.2 or RH 9? which is best for a proxy/cache/NAT box (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-distributions-5/mandrake-9-2-or-rh-9-which-is-best-for-a-proxy-cache-nat-box-135404/)

debloxie 01-16-2004 09:08 AM
Mandrake 9.2 or RH 9? which is best for a proxy/cache/NAT box
 
i am liking mandrake 9.2 very much coz its the only distro to have installed on my laptop(compaq presaio 910US) while RH9 AND Suse 8.1 completely lost out. i got everything working. but thats not the issue. i know most pple run RH9 for their servers but i just feel the RH hype is too much and wud want to try others.

i want to setup a linux box that will serve a network like 10 systems. it will serve as a NAT proxy/cache,DNS,DHCP,bandwidth manager and filtering. what do u suggest i use?

colnago 01-16-2004 10:45 AM
RH9 has switched; compare mandrake 9.2 w fedora core 1. Nothing wrong with RH9, but updates will be comming for fedora w/o needing to buy support.

Personally, I am using mandrake for bind/dhcp/nat/firewall w/o problem.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 PM.