Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
06-28-2002, 08:11 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: May 2001
Location: Norton, KS
Distribution: Mandrake, Xandros, and Debian 3.0 (Woody) as a proxy
Posts: 103
Rep:
|
Mandrake 8.2 - NAT, conntrack, & H323
Has anyone gotten Mandrake 8.2 or some other more recent 2.4 based 'desktop firendly' distro to work with H323 NAT/Masquerading? I mean full support. Incoming & Outgoing?
Thanks,
|
|
|
07-01-2002, 04:47 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: May 2002
Location: Dalec, HU
Distribution: Redhat 7.3
Posts: 696
Rep:
|
don't bother with distro proving firewall
goto
www.linuxguruz.org/iptables, and copy/adjust one of the firewalls for your needs
|
|
|
07-01-2002, 06:24 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: May 2001
Location: Norton, KS
Distribution: Mandrake, Xandros, and Debian 3.0 (Woody) as a proxy
Posts: 103
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Noerr
don't bother with distro proving firewall
goto
www.linuxguruz.org/iptables, and copy/adjust one of the firewalls for your needs
|
I don't get it. How does that solve the original request for assistance?
|
|
|
07-01-2002, 06:27 PM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,696
|
Re: Mandrake 8.2 - NAT, conntrack, & H323
Quote:
Originally posted by gboutwel
Has anyone gotten Mandrake 8.2 or some other more recent 2.4 based 'desktop firendly' distro to work with H323 NAT/Masquerading? I mean full support. Incoming & Outgoing?
Thanks,
|
I've tried it with MDK 8.0. From mandrake Control Center. Was working correctly, but I prefer the rules I write myself 
|
|
|
07-01-2002, 07:12 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: May 2001
Location: Norton, KS
Distribution: Mandrake, Xandros, and Debian 3.0 (Woody) as a proxy
Posts: 103
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Re: Re: Mandrake 8.2 - NAT, conntrack, & H323
Quote:
Originally posted by Mara
I've tried it with MDK 8.0. From mandrake Control Center. Was working correctly, but I prefer the rules I write myself
|
What did you have to do to get it working in Mandrake 8.0?
|
|
|
07-02-2002, 07:28 AM
|
#6
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,696
|
Just for fun 
|
|
|
07-03-2002, 04:03 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: May 2001
Location: Norton, KS
Distribution: Mandrake, Xandros, and Debian 3.0 (Woody) as a proxy
Posts: 103
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mara
Just for fun
|
Not why, but WHAT did you do to get it working?
George
|
|
|
07-03-2002, 04:20 PM
|
#8
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,696
|
? I just clickd and it worked. Nothing special. No cheats and editing it by hand 
|
|
|
07-03-2002, 05:32 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: May 2001
Location: Norton, KS
Distribution: Mandrake, Xandros, and Debian 3.0 (Woody) as a proxy
Posts: 103
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mara
? I just clickd and it worked. Nothing special. No cheats and editing it by hand
|
Incoming and outgoing calls, with the MDK 8.0 machine, or with a machine masqed from behind the MDK 8.0 machine?
George
|
|
|
07-04-2002, 03:35 PM
|
#10
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,696
|
With masques machine... Do you have problems with it?
|
|
|
07-04-2002, 07:31 PM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: May 2001
Location: Norton, KS
Distribution: Mandrake, Xandros, and Debian 3.0 (Woody) as a proxy
Posts: 103
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mara
With masques machine... Do you have problems with it?
|
Yes actually I have. I've been trying to get both masqed incoming & outgoing H323 calls to work in some linux or another since RH 6.2. I've typically gotten outgoing to work, but I actually need incoming and outgoing, preferrably without portfw (but I really don't see how that's possible) or with portfw to mutliple internal LAN machines.
You can do this with Winblow's ICS, but with linux it's just not been possible, or at least, I've not been able to. I'm even not against a little kernel & kernel module recompiling, but ideally it would work 'out of the box' like Winblows.
Last edited by gboutwel; 07-04-2002 at 07:32 PM.
|
|
|
07-05-2002, 05:27 PM
|
#13
|
Member
Registered: May 2001
Location: Norton, KS
Distribution: Mandrake, Xandros, and Debian 3.0 (Woody) as a proxy
Posts: 103
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mara
I throught it was a generic kernel, but it looks as it wasn't. You've got 2 options:
|
Actually the way I see it I have 4 options:
3) Use Mandrake 8.0 instead of 8.2, cause it works in 8.0
4) Question the 'decision' to add something this cool in 8.0, but then drop it in 8.2 and/or post bug report to the their bugzilla about the 'loss'.
To be honest I never got around to trying Mandrake 8.0... And I had never heard of it working in 8.0 If I had I would have probably moved to it long ago (shortly after it was released)
Currently I use RH6.2 cause I've got a lot of time invested in it and to this point I hadn't had too many compelling reasons to upgrade. But recently I've seen that the PPPoE has gone 'gold' in 2.4, and if Mandrake 8.0 has a working h323 masq, then I may have what I've been waiting for and a more than compelling reason to 'pitch' RH6.2.
Last edited by gboutwel; 07-05-2002 at 05:37 PM.
|
|
|
07-06-2002, 04:41 PM
|
#14
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,696
|
Better not install 8.0. Not because it's bad. I install many patches/updates etc into my kernels and I sometimes I don't know where I installed what. It may be this case.
|
|
|
07-06-2002, 06:00 PM
|
#15
|
Member
Registered: May 2001
Location: Norton, KS
Distribution: Mandrake, Xandros, and Debian 3.0 (Woody) as a proxy
Posts: 103
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mara
Better not install 8.0. Not because it's bad. I install many patches/updates etc into my kernels and I sometimes I don't know where I installed what. It may be this case.
|
Ahh... So it may not have been 'plain' Mandrake 8.0, but an modified Kernel that you ran.
Even so... At least I know it works. That's better than I'd been at to this point. I was beginning to loose heart that linux would ever be able to do what Windows can do now. Perhaps there is hope after all.
I'm a programmer, so compiling the kernel, et all doesn't bother me as much as it would most people. But most of my skills are from my Day Job - which is Microsoft. I would like to improve my skills in Linux.
Thanks for the 'extended' chat.
George
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:53 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|