looking for a distribution without a gui (or, by default, has no gui)
Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
You can install any distribution without GUI. By default from the bigger ones only Arch comes without GUI, but as stated, you can do that for any distro, so just use the one you are most comfortable with.
The differences between distros are mostly with the package management scheme, the stucture of the init scripts, and the way the GUI is set up. From the user viewpoint, it may be the last one that has the most impact---and also involves the most work.
I use Arch---I'm not sure I would say that it "no GUI by default"---it's really more like "nothing by default". In that regard, it's maybe like Linux from scratch.
to get up and running and doing useful things quickly, CLI-only, I cannot think of a better choice that Arch. The only downside might be that the configuration files don't really relate much to how other distros do it.
I'd say that if you ask then you may have a tough time using it.
Unlike the OS BeOS the underlying part of linux is some set of commands that could run in a shell of some kind. It is the most basic part of any linux distro and can't be removed that I know of.
One of the smallest if you can find it was a special floppy called tomsrtbt. Have to peek for mirrors or old links to get the image.
As noted, any disto can be installed without a gui or set to boot to a shell instead of a gui. Even that isn't really needed. It is easy to use a shell in gui's by some terminal.
What is going to be the use of this typically bash command environment?
Thanks TobiSGD, pixellany, and jefro for your replies.
To answer your question, jefro, about what i'm going to use it for, my purpose is to test my hardware. (Or more exactly, to test my drivers.)
My computer has this problem that it freezes after several hours of operation (and does so under different versions of ubuntu, under blag, and under debian 6.0.4).
However i recently heard that bad drivers can cause this kind of problem (one person claimed in fact that in every computer he ever had which froze, it was a consequence of either a bad video card or bad drivers).
And in fact, i've discovered that i can leave my computer in grub for days without freezing.
But that doesn't really prove that it's a graphics driver problem, because maybe it can stay up for days in grub because it is not doing anything whatsoever except waiting for characters to be typed.
So i would like a quickie way to bring the machine up without any x windows, but also make sure that there's some activity on it. (So i could use it for a few days in a purely command line mode without it visiting any graphics driver code. Or i could write some code to just loop around and do something every once in a while.)
If it freezes while there's no graphics driver in play, then that exonerates the driver.
But if it doesn't freeze, then i can start researching how to get a better driver for my hardware.
So it's not that i'm so in love with the command line so much as trying to figure out what's going on with my setup.
And if i set aside a partition for an OS that has no graphics component at all, then i don't have to fiddle around very much.
On modern systems the graphics driver will kick in, at least a part of it, regardless if you have a GUI or not. For your purpose you need a system that doesn't support KMS (kernel mode setting). I would recommend to go for Microcore Linux, it hasn't KMS enabled by default, AFAIK.
On modern systems the graphics driver will kick in, at least a part of it, regardless if you have a GUI or not. For your purpose you need a system that doesn't support KMS (kernel mode setting). I would recommend to go for Microcore Linux, it hasn't KMS enabled by default, AFAIK.
It's easy to disable KMS for any(?) distro though by adding 'nomodeset' to the arguments on the kernel line.
If it's freezing after a few hours of operation on a few different distros, it's likely to be a hardware problem - I'd guess it's temperature related - could be the CPU, the HDD, motherboard chipset, memory, GPU, etc. By not running xorg you'll prove that the system doesn't crash when not under load - as you've already proven by leaving it at the grub screen.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.