Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
you know.. that might work better.. going with the stable package, which should surely work and then add the testing repos from there and upgrade.. so then.. latest stable release, uncheck everything, add testing and mate repos upgrade, then install mate and i should be good to go
believe it or not.. ive installed arch a few times, even installed gentoo before and my first successful distro.. the one where i felt i made the most progress in learning and understanding linux, and getting things i needed to work, was i believe slackware 10.2, havent used it since though.. so im no stranger to linux.. just found gentoo took too long to install things, slackware was too high maintainence having to maintain all packages myself, and that took a while too, and arch.. well, to be honest i could easily go back to using arch, i have zero issues with it
bottom line is.. LMDE seems for me to be that sort of in between that doesnt seem well supported yet, seems 90% of all documentation or information i find online is either for ubuntu, debian, or arch, so id rather just stick with the main distro right now as opposed to a less-supported derivative
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jason41987
you know.. that might work better.. going with the stable package, which should surely work and then add the testing repos from there and upgrade.. so then.. latest stable release, uncheck everything, add testing and mate repos upgrade, then install mate and i should be good to go
If you don't mind me saying that is just the wrong way to go about it, if this is what you are thinking of doing save yourself time and energy by pointing LMDE to the official Debian repositories, add the MATE repositories, remove the Mint repositories and upgrade from there.
Just change your sources.list to
Code:
deb http://ftp.au.debian.org/debian/ jessie main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://repo.mate-desktop.org/debian jessie main
changing the ftp.au.debian to suit your local repository location.
k3lt01.. i think the purpose of doing the clean install would be to get rid of mints default packages completely and have only ones from debian or other repos (like the mate repo)
I guess I was not as succinct as I should have been. My bad. I was referring to Mate not being in Debian's Stable repository. To be honest, I am not very knowledgeable about third-party repositories with packages for Debian, because I stay away from them. Of course Mate could be installed on a Stable system from an outside source, but as always, if third-party repositories break the system, the user gets to keep the pieces.
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jason41987
k3lt01.. i think the purpose of doing the clean install would be to get rid of mints default packages completely and have only ones from debian or other repos (like the mate repo)
That would be a good reason to do it but if you start with Stable, then update to Testing you're going to have old defaults from Stable still there. If you want to use Testing install Testing, don't install Stable and then download everything all over again.
believe it or not.. ive installed arch a few times, even installed gentoo before and my first successful distro.. the one where i felt i made the most progress in learning and understanding linux, and getting things i needed to work, was i believe slackware 10.2, havent used it since though.. so im no stranger to linux.. just found gentoo took too long to install things, slackware was too high maintainence having to maintain all packages myself, and that took a while too, and arch.. well, to be honest i could easily go back to using arch, i have zero issues with it
bottom line is.. LMDE seems for me to be that sort of in between that doesnt seem well supported yet, seems 90% of all documentation or information i find online is either for ubuntu, debian, or arch, so id rather just stick with the main distro right now as opposed to a less-supported derivative
So use Arch it'll take what 40 minutes it install? Then you can add the mate repo and install that and move on frome there.
well, i cant exactly install arch all off the top of my head.. im only able to do it with my laptop next to me so i can follow each step quite carefully... most the steps could be automated though... but.. i dont know what to do if i try to get debian testing working.. the ISOs i used just wont work.. i could try ones from a couple weeks ago and hope they do
though i like arch.. i feel its just canadas attempt to making their own distro borrowing a number of features from debian and ubuntu, but for whatever reason attempt to force people to go through the pain in the rear end installation that for the most part, could be automated... debian unstable is essentially "rolling" and testing is just an added filter for better reliability..
the downside however, is that most .deb packages you find now on certain websites for software not available in repos, are going to be made for ubuntu.. i cant stand ubuntu and i find it incredibly annoying that theyve seemed to have hijacked almost anything deb related
a debian testng CD iso, not a netinst just finished downloading.. so im going to try that, see if the mouse and keyboard work, if not, then im going to keep trying netinst images one at a time going back until something does
i downloaded the 32-bit version of debian testing CD1 to install on my laptop first.. see how it differs from LMDE and ive been itching to get rid of windows 8 from it anyway.. added the MATE repository for jessie, notices the main testing repository was missing (which explained why i couldnt find important packages like xorg).. so i added that, update, and im installing the MATE desktop on top of a barebones CLI installation of debian right now
the hilarious part was i kept trying to find my old /home/Downloads folder.. was afraid i accidently reformatted my /home partition, was close to freaking out before i remembers.. this is an entirely different computer, the /home partition i was looking for is on another computer entirely
Last edited by jason41987; 11-10-2013 at 04:17 PM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.