LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-09-2013, 10:04 PM   #16
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900

Rep: Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randicus Draco Albus View Post
Stable is the best option, until one is familiar with the system, but that will not be an option if having Mate is your primary concern.
Say what? There is a Wheezy (Debian Stable) repository from MATE.
 
Old 11-09-2013, 10:23 PM   #17
jason41987
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Posts: 148

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
you know.. that might work better.. going with the stable package, which should surely work and then add the testing repos from there and upgrade.. so then.. latest stable release, uncheck everything, add testing and mate repos upgrade, then install mate and i should be good to go
 
Old 11-09-2013, 10:31 PM   #18
jason41987
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Posts: 148

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
believe it or not.. ive installed arch a few times, even installed gentoo before and my first successful distro.. the one where i felt i made the most progress in learning and understanding linux, and getting things i needed to work, was i believe slackware 10.2, havent used it since though.. so im no stranger to linux.. just found gentoo took too long to install things, slackware was too high maintainence having to maintain all packages myself, and that took a while too, and arch.. well, to be honest i could easily go back to using arch, i have zero issues with it

bottom line is.. LMDE seems for me to be that sort of in between that doesnt seem well supported yet, seems 90% of all documentation or information i find online is either for ubuntu, debian, or arch, so id rather just stick with the main distro right now as opposed to a less-supported derivative
 
Old 11-09-2013, 10:44 PM   #19
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900

Rep: Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637
Quote:
Originally Posted by jason41987 View Post
you know.. that might work better.. going with the stable package, which should surely work and then add the testing repos from there and upgrade.. so then.. latest stable release, uncheck everything, add testing and mate repos upgrade, then install mate and i should be good to go
If you don't mind me saying that is just the wrong way to go about it, if this is what you are thinking of doing save yourself time and energy by pointing LMDE to the official Debian repositories, add the MATE repositories, remove the Mint repositories and upgrade from there.

Just change your sources.list to
Code:
deb http://ftp.au.debian.org/debian/ jessie main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://repo.mate-desktop.org/debian jessie main
changing the ftp.au.debian to suit your local repository location.

Last edited by k3lt01; 11-09-2013 at 10:45 PM.
 
Old 11-09-2013, 11:06 PM   #20
jason41987
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Posts: 148

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
k3lt01.. i think the purpose of doing the clean install would be to get rid of mints default packages completely and have only ones from debian or other repos (like the mate repo)
 
Old 11-10-2013, 12:21 AM   #21
Randicus Draco Albus
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2011
Location: Hiding somewhere on planet Earth.
Distribution: No distribution. OpenBSD operating system
Posts: 1,711
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635
Quote:
Originally Posted by k3lt01 View Post
I guess I was not as succinct as I should have been. My bad. I was referring to Mate not being in Debian's Stable repository. To be honest, I am not very knowledgeable about third-party repositories with packages for Debian, because I stay away from them. Of course Mate could be installed on a Stable system from an outside source, but as always, if third-party repositories break the system, the user gets to keep the pieces.
 
Old 11-10-2013, 12:24 AM   #22
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900

Rep: Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637
Quote:
Originally Posted by jason41987 View Post
k3lt01.. i think the purpose of doing the clean install would be to get rid of mints default packages completely and have only ones from debian or other repos (like the mate repo)
That would be a good reason to do it but if you start with Stable, then update to Testing you're going to have old defaults from Stable still there. If you want to use Testing install Testing, don't install Stable and then download everything all over again.
 
Old 11-10-2013, 02:43 AM   #23
Germany_chris
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: NOVA
Distribution: Debian 12
Posts: 1,071

Rep: Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by jason41987 View Post
believe it or not.. ive installed arch a few times, even installed gentoo before and my first successful distro.. the one where i felt i made the most progress in learning and understanding linux, and getting things i needed to work, was i believe slackware 10.2, havent used it since though.. so im no stranger to linux.. just found gentoo took too long to install things, slackware was too high maintainence having to maintain all packages myself, and that took a while too, and arch.. well, to be honest i could easily go back to using arch, i have zero issues with it

bottom line is.. LMDE seems for me to be that sort of in between that doesnt seem well supported yet, seems 90% of all documentation or information i find online is either for ubuntu, debian, or arch, so id rather just stick with the main distro right now as opposed to a less-supported derivative
So use Arch it'll take what 40 minutes it install? Then you can add the mate repo and install that and move on frome there.
 
Old 11-10-2013, 09:31 AM   #24
jason41987
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Posts: 148

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
well, i cant exactly install arch all off the top of my head.. im only able to do it with my laptop next to me so i can follow each step quite carefully... most the steps could be automated though... but.. i dont know what to do if i try to get debian testing working.. the ISOs i used just wont work.. i could try ones from a couple weeks ago and hope they do
 
Old 11-10-2013, 09:47 AM   #25
Germany_chris
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: NOVA
Distribution: Debian 12
Posts: 1,071

Rep: Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497
I made a book many moons a go and keep it up to date..

The install process it's to much to overcome
 
Old 11-10-2013, 10:20 AM   #26
jason41987
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Posts: 148

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
though i like arch.. i feel its just canadas attempt to making their own distro borrowing a number of features from debian and ubuntu, but for whatever reason attempt to force people to go through the pain in the rear end installation that for the most part, could be automated... debian unstable is essentially "rolling" and testing is just an added filter for better reliability..

the downside however, is that most .deb packages you find now on certain websites for software not available in repos, are going to be made for ubuntu.. i cant stand ubuntu and i find it incredibly annoying that theyve seemed to have hijacked almost anything deb related

a debian testng CD iso, not a netinst just finished downloading.. so im going to try that, see if the mouse and keyboard work, if not, then im going to keep trying netinst images one at a time going back until something does
 
Old 11-10-2013, 04:14 PM   #27
jason41987
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Posts: 148

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
i downloaded the 32-bit version of debian testing CD1 to install on my laptop first.. see how it differs from LMDE and ive been itching to get rid of windows 8 from it anyway.. added the MATE repository for jessie, notices the main testing repository was missing (which explained why i couldnt find important packages like xorg).. so i added that, update, and im installing the MATE desktop on top of a barebones CLI installation of debian right now

the hilarious part was i kept trying to find my old /home/Downloads folder.. was afraid i accidently reformatted my /home partition, was close to freaking out before i remembers.. this is an entirely different computer, the /home partition i was looking for is on another computer entirely

Last edited by jason41987; 11-10-2013 at 04:17 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is it possible to downgrade/upgrade the debian cuonterpart of lmde? pcninja Linux Mint 3 10-23-2013 03:52 PM
[SOLVED] Can LMDE repository be used in Debian Sid? Hungry ghost Debian 6 02-29-2012 06:57 PM
[SOLVED] CUPS Network printer problems in LMDE/Debian MogaMoga Linux - Hardware 1 01-20-2012 09:45 AM
trouble Networking Debian server, LMDE, and Win7 kbkatz Linux - Networking 1 06-16-2011 08:11 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration