[SOLVED] List of the highest rated beginner's operating systems
Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
List of the highest rated beginner's operating systems
I've found that Distrowatch ranks OS by people's average ratings as well as their page-visit popularity. They give very different results, for example Linux Mint is ranked at number one by page-visits, but at rank one-hundred-and-ten by ratings.
As I'm considering changing or upgrading my OS, I have gone through the whole list of beginner's OS at DistroWatch and noted down their rating score.
In the list below, first is the rating, then the total number of people who rated it, then the name of the OS.
At the end of each line, as a crude measure of how up to date the OS is, is the number of versions behind the current version of Firefox that the distribution is. So with the current version of Firefox being 53, a version on the distribution of 45 would give the number 8. (My Linux Mint OS ships with FF50 and so has a number of 3, but has updated itself to the latest version).
Ignoring the OSs with a low number of raters and hence a less reliable rating, it looks as if PCLinuxOS is top of the list, and its version of Firefox is right up to date as well. The large number of raters also suggests it has a big user-base and support.
If you are willing to take a chance with a lesser number of raters, then Solydxk and Ubuntu Mate both have a slightly higher rating, although Solydxk ships with a version of Firefox that is eight versions old. I'd never heard of Solydxk before.
This is a rather useless feature. Absolute got 10, but only one person reviewed it. Mint got an average of 8.77 from a total of 131 reviewers. And who are these reviewers, anyway?
If we're talking about beginners, then a vital thing is documentation. Is there a manual with installation and instructions? I liked Black Lab, but I don't remember any documentation, and some of the Ubuntu wiki is seriously dated — including the installation instructions. The Mint Manual is much more use, and the PCLinuxOS Knowledge Base is excellent.
I have been disappointed with PCLinuxOS, which I had thought I would install as my everyday operating system. I downloaded and used a liveCD, but it did not get itself on the internet, did not get the correct resolution for the display, would not recognise or print anything on my old printer.
I have just tried an old liveCD I have for Ubuntu 16.04.1 and it did all of the above automatically without requiring any intervention by me. However it is shocking that Ubuntu sends your disk searches off to Amazon and others so they can give you personalised adverts, despite promising that it would stop doing this.
My conclusion is that anyone who is not an expert should use the most mainstream Linux distributions, since these have the most support, and hopefully the biggest range of supported hardware, and save yourself hours of frustration trying to get the thing to work. So that means its either Ubuntu or Mint, and from my experience Ubuntu is probably better. Ubuntu has a different screen layout to what I was used to in Windows, but that is a trivial consideration.
The above suggests that the DistroWatch user rankings are unreliable, regrettably.
I have just tried an old liveCD I have for Ubuntu 16.04.1 and it did all of the above automatically without requiring any intervention by me. However it is shocking that Ubuntu sends your disk searches off to Amazon and others so they can give you personalised adverts, despite promising that it would stop doing this. .
Your info is out of date, grumpyskeptic - Ubuntu no longer do this, and online searching is also disabled by default.
I have now tried a Ubuntu Mate livecd, and I think that is the OS I shall upgrade to when I have time as it seems better than anything else I have tried. Although Mint is mainstream and quite well supported, Ubuntu is even more so both of those things. I prefer the Mate variation of Ubuntu as the screen layout is more classic/like-Windows, and it should not have the spyware problems that the mainstream version used to or maybe still does, plus it should be less demanding of resources and hence be quicker and more stable. It is also near the top of the list above.
I found that all the liveCDs would not automatically connect to the internet if I had turned my modem off when re-starting, but if I kept the modem on then they would. Only the Puppy Linux livecd would carefully guide you and help you to get connected to the internet, none of the others did. PL cannot be installed except with great difficulty, so is only useful as a liveCD.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by grumpyskeptic
My conclusion is that anyone who is not an expert should use the most mainstream Linux distributions, since these have the most support, and hopefully the biggest range of supported hardware, and save yourself hours of frustration trying to get the thing to work. So that means its either Ubuntu or Mint, and from my experience Ubuntu is probably better. Ubuntu has a different screen layout to what I was used to in Windows, but that is a trivial consideration.
The above suggests that the DistroWatch user rankings are unreliable, regrettably.
I tend to agree with this. I think one of the 'buntus or Mints (things like Lubuntu, Xubuntu and the equivalent Mints, for example, would avoid Unity/GNOME[when it comes] and work on lower-powered systems) would be the way I would suggest people go.
On the other hand, there's a reason I started using Debian Sid as my day-to-day OS on all my machines and it's not because it's difficult to install, configure or use. Similarly, Slackware's a very logical system and arguably one of the most stable one can run due to being largely as upstream intended and preferring simplicity over complexity.
I suppose, after typing the above, it reminds me that people learning to install, configure and use Linux themselves (in other words not your dear old aunt who you sysadmin for) should really start with the easy stuff like Ubuntu and Mint, try things like Fedora and CentOS then look into Slackware, Gentoo and others and decide what is easiest for them. As I typed I really am not kidding and not trying to sound smart when I state that I use Debian Sid because I find it's the easiest way to do things -- I'm that lazy.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.