Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
09-28-2016, 04:30 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Dodgeville, WI
Distribution: Mageia 5
Posts: 46
Rep:
|
List of Linux Distros with non-changing repository names
Hi,
Is there a list of linux distributions where the repository names do not change with every release (apart from rolling release distros)? Ubuntu changes their repo names from precise to quintal to canoanical like that for every release. Fedora (23, 24 etc) & Salix (14.0, 14.2 etc) uses their distribution release number in their repository names.
I am trying to find a list of distributions where the repository name stays constant. So, if I upgrade from v1 to v2, I do not have to fiddle with the repository names.
Thanks,
Balaji.
|
|
|
09-28-2016, 04:42 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,882
|
Debian has 'oldstable', 'stable', 'testing' & 'unstable', however using the release codename is generally recommended to avoid "surprise upgrades". 
Last edited by descendant_command; 09-28-2016 at 04:43 AM.
|
|
|
09-28-2016, 04:45 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Dodgeville, WI
Distribution: Mageia 5
Posts: 46
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Does the repository name of debian never changes?
Thanks,
Balaji.
|
|
|
09-28-2016, 04:55 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,882
|
Currently the repo for the stable release can be referred to as either 'stable' or 'jessie'.
After the next release, either 'stable' or 'stretch' will point to the same place.
|
|
|
09-28-2016, 05:00 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Dodgeville, WI
Distribution: Mageia 5
Posts: 46
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Correct me if I am wrong. I guess Debian stable is wheezy and testing is jessie. So, "stable" and "wheezy" for the distros that uses debian stable like point linux. "testing" or "jessie" should be used for distros that are based off of debian testing, like Sparky linux.
Let me know if I am missing something.
I prefer not to stay with Debian stable as the packages and kernels are very old. Since I also look for stability, I am staying away from debian testing also.
Thanks,
Balaji.
|
|
|
09-28-2016, 05:22 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
Distribution: Mageia 7, Devuan & Void Linux
Posts: 172
Rep:
|
Stable is Jessie and Testing is Stretch. The Unstable is Sid (bleeding edge).
|
|
|
09-28-2016, 05:25 AM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Dodgeville, WI
Distribution: Mageia 5
Posts: 46
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for the info.
|
|
|
09-28-2016, 06:53 AM
|
#8
|
Moderator
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 26,862
|
I am not aware of a list. How it works depends on the distribution.
Fedora and Ubuntu should automatically update the mainline repositories when you perform a dist-upgrade although third party repositories may not be. Salix does not recommend the automatic dist-upgrade and so you have to manually edit the sources. Others do not have a dist-upgrade process or always recommend a fresh install. In any case before an upgrade check the change log or distribution notes. With major changes like switching from sysV to systemd a fresh install might be the better choice.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|