Linux for an Old Computer (P-II, 256MB RAM, 10GB HDD)
Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Linux for an Old Computer (P-II, 256MB RAM, 10GB HDD)
I've recently acquired an old computer, with a 233 MHz Pentium II, 256 MB of PC-133 RAM, and a 10 GB hard drive. Either the CD-ROM drive or IDE controller is somewhat bad, since CD transfers tend to fail, especially large ones. Knowing this, which Linux distro would be best?
Slackware's install CD gets an error when both trying to run the network setup, and when trying to install packages.
Gentoo's LiveCD only has a problem with its VESA framebuffer, and otherwise has no problems.
Even Knoppix's hardware detection is brought to its knees, as the VooDoo video card is incompatible with the X server, or so it claims.
I really dislike package selection, and only want a minimal required amount of package installs.
have you tried damn small linux. It is usually run live and is designed for low end systems. however with your faulty cd rom drive you could also install to the harddrive so you dont have to rely on cd drive. either way it works well on low end systems.
Distribution: Slackware 10.2, Debian Testing/Unstable, Ubuntu Breezy Badger, working on LFS
Posts: 228
Rep:
What are you calling old? I successfully installed KDE on a 10+ year old Pentium I with 48mb of ram. I'd call 256 great!
To answer your question, though, I'd go with DSL, just like tamoneya reccomended.
DSL doesn't work; X's screen is glarbled, the mouse doesn't move, even though it's an ExplorerPS/2 mouse, and the keyboard doesn't work. Any other tries?
I'm thinking about Gentoo, since X11R7 has a working VooDoo driver, and I can set the keymap. Plus, I've had far more luck with with the 2.6.16 kernels.
Last edited by Kenji Miyamoto; 06-23-2006 at 03:44 PM.
Distribution: Slackware 10.2, Debian Testing/Unstable, Ubuntu Breezy Badger, working on LFS
Posts: 228
Rep:
Gentoo on an old computer is a no-no. It compiles all programs from source, which can take forever on a slow machine. I tried it on 128 megs of RAM and the install took about a week (literally, w/ KDE). Try something light the distros that have been recommended, or maybe Puppy Linux. I also hear Kanotix has excellent hardware detection but don't take my word for it.
Gentoo on an old computer is a no-no. It compiles all programs from source, which can take forever on a slow machine. I tried it on 128 megs of RAM and the install took about a week (literally, w/ KDE). Try something light the distros that have been recommended, or maybe Puppy Linux. I also hear Kanotix has excellent hardware detection but don't take my word for it.
I'm planning on compiling everything with the -Os optimization, and am only going to use XFce and X11R7, since the way Gentoo handles it minimizes the amount of compilations.
Distribution: Slackware 10.2, Debian Testing/Unstable, Ubuntu Breezy Badger, working on LFS
Posts: 228
Rep:
Good luck! Hope you can compile efficiently alright. I'm unfamilliar with the -Os option, though. Can you explain it? I guess if you keep it light it'll work great. Tell me how it goes!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.