LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-03-2012, 12:41 AM   #1
remusrm
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2012
Distribution: deb and rpm standard;-)
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
LIBRE distro


I am considering moving to a libre distro. What would you recommend to use? I tried FSF gnewsense and is relatively quite old. Could you please give me the pros and cons of this?
 
Old 12-03-2012, 06:24 AM   #2
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
Before even considering a libre distro I would test if your hardware will run without proprietary firmware and drivers. On my laptop, for example, running libre is impossible, for one because of the Broadcom WLAN adapter, but also because the free radeon driver overheats my CPU.

The pros of a libre distribution? You are only running free software.
The cons? You are only running free software, limiting yourself to sometimes inferior solutions for ideological reasons.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-03-2012, 08:25 AM   #3
adamk75
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 3,091

Rep: Reputation: 399Reputation: 399Reputation: 399Reputation: 399
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
Before even considering a libre distro I would test if your hardware will run without proprietary firmware and drivers. On my laptop, for example, running libre is impossible, for one because of the Broadcom WLAN adapter, but also because the free radeon driver overheats my CPU.
Even if you did not have overheating issues with the radeon driver, that driver also uses proprietary firmware.

Adam
 
Old 12-03-2012, 08:46 AM   #4
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamk75 View Post
Even if you did not have overheating issues with the radeon driver, that driver also uses proprietary firmware.

Adam
True, I did not think about that.
 
Old 12-03-2012, 11:15 AM   #5
remusrm
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2012
Distribution: deb and rpm standard;-)
Posts: 18

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I am using it on IBM R51. On the R61 I used at work the wifi is not detected. The rest is. Considering what you guys have said. I might just give up and use CentOS5.8
 
Old 12-04-2012, 12:11 AM   #6
remusrm
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2012
Distribution: deb and rpm standard;-)
Posts: 18

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
Before even considering a libre distro I would test if your hardware will run without proprietary firmware and drivers. On my laptop, for example, running libre is impossible, for one because of the Broadcom WLAN adapter, but also because the free radeon driver overheats my CPU.

The pros of a libre distribution? You are only running free software.
The cons? You are only running free software, limiting yourself to sometimes inferior solutions for ideological reasons.
Well, even Debian did not detect my wifi card, and some of the other did not detect my wifi, ethernet. I think in a real world this is really not working out.
 
Old 12-04-2012, 06:36 AM   #7
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
Quote:
Originally Posted by remusrm View Post
Well, even Debian did not detect my wifi card, and some of the other did not detect my wifi, ethernet. I think in a real world this is really not working out.
There is only one reason why Debian is not considered a libre distro: Because the FSF think they make it to easy to install closed and proprietary software using their non-free repository. if you don't activate the non-free repository in your configuration Debian is basically a libre distribution.
If you want to use your wifi, look at the Debian Wiki how to install the drivers for it, most of the time it involves activating the non-free repo.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-04-2012, 12:16 PM   #8
remusrm
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2012
Distribution: deb and rpm standard;-)
Posts: 18

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
There is only one reason why Debian is not considered a libre distro: Because the FSF think they make it to easy to install closed and proprietary software using their non-free repository. if you don't activate the non-free repository in your configuration Debian is basically a libre distribution.
If you want to use your wifi, look at the Debian Wiki how to install the drivers for it, most of the time it involves activating the non-free repo.
Actually I did find a zip file with all the non-free firmwares for wifi devices and used it that way. One odd thing was that when probing for ethernet and wifi, the system became unresponsive and took forever to come back. Asked me to install the firmware and I did and yet again was darn slow searching for it on the usb drive. Overall took 45 min to install it with the net install CD. Just too much hasle.
 
Old 12-04-2012, 02:35 PM   #9
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
There are "unofficial" CD images with non-free firmware included: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/un...ding-firmware/
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is there a Linux-Libre version of Slackware? Experiences with Linux-Libre? DrCube Slackware 28 01-30-2013 09:08 AM
libre office take up whole window. casperdaghost Linux - Newbie 4 02-04-2012 08:44 AM
install libre office mposwal Slackware 12 11-03-2011 07:34 PM
LXer: Libre vs Non-Libre: It All Comes Down To Trust LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-18-2007 05:00 PM
LXer: Mix Libre LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-12-2007 12:21 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration