Kernel Panic -- not syncing: attempted to kill idle task
I am trying to install Linux (RedHat, Fedora) and am running into some serious problems. Any help/insights will be really appreciated.
I have a Windows XP machine and VMWare Workstation 4.0 installed on it. I downloaded Fedora's ISO files from redhat.com and tried installing on a new virtual machine I created. In the virtual machine settings, for CD-ROM, under "Connection" setting I selected "Use ISO Image" and gave the full path for the first ISO file. The "Virtual device node" was set to "IDE 1:0 CD-ROM1". When I started the virtual machine, it went to Fedora's initial install screen and I hit enter to start the installation process. Some text scrolls through the screen and it stops with the last message being "Kernel Panic -- not syncing: attempted to kill an idle task". I have tried the following with same result: 1. Removed the virtual machine and recreated and tried from the iso file. I thought may be the ISO file was corrupt so I did the following: 2. Removed and recreated the virtual machine and tried to install RedHat Enterprise 4 from a CD, no luck. 3. Reformatted the partitions, created a brand new virtual machine and tried installing Redhat Enterprise 4 -- no luck. 4. The same Redhat CD works on another machine, where I created a new virtual machine and ran the install. I am basically stuck and don't have a clue on what to do. My guess is that the new Redhat installation I am trying is somehow picking up the boot loader from the failed installation of Fedora. Now here are my questions: 1. When using VMWare and installing a guest OS, does it put all the files related to that guest OS within the folders designated for the guest OS? 2. Does it put some of the files outside the folders designated for guest OS (somewhere within the host OS folders)? If so which folders? 3. Does a guest OS install write anything to the host OS's MBR even when using VMware and virtual machines? If so, how do I get rid of it from the MBR? Thanks in advance for your help RG |
same problem
I hope that some one can help us since I have exactly the same problem as. This happens with fedora and Mandriva. This however doesn't seem to be a problem for whitebox liberation.
I have also tried different emulators. Vmware and connectix. Both have the same response |
Solution for VPC 2004
Install service pack 1 for VPC 2004.Linux will easily install with this service pack.
|
I had same issue trying to install 2 differ Linux flavors on a laptop. solved after I pulled the 2 memory sticks, swapped them (reseated) and all worked fine
|
wow
Wow I have no idea why swapping the 2 RAM sticks around worked....
But it did. Thanks BillyMac |
What if you only have 1 stick of memory?
|
1 stick?
try putting it in the other slot?
lol. Since then I have found that I also blew my network card :(:(:( But thats orite im getting a new one theyre not too expensive! Have fun. Luke |
I am getting a similar problem with Connectix Virtual PC 5.1 - identical error message.
So far I have tried Slax (Frodo, Popcorn & KillBill), Olive, Vector, Knoppix, and Debian. The live cd's as both images and real disks, and debian from an HD image. I think it has something to do with the 2.6 kernel, as ever since I recompiled my deb hd image from 2.4 to 2.6 I get that error. Any suggestions? It all works fine in the latest Beta version of VMWare, but I can't afford to buy that so would really like to fix VPC. (If it helps I have a 3.0 GHz Prescott with 2GB Ram) |
i had the same with a amd k6 2/400 box. had a play with the dimm modules and i got it working. this kind of error is related to memory? well it did for me. :cool:
have fun, bt |
This is what I see:
Code:
Red Hat nash version 4.12.17mdk starting |
Hate to bump an old thread but wanted to let it be known that swapping memory around did the trick for me also. I found this thread during a Google search and wanted to help anyone who might be experiencing the same thing.
|
This worked for me also, trying to install on an old Compaq with Debian Etch 4.0r3. Seems very strange that this would work but it does!
|
bear in mind that linux (or os/2) is more sensitive with memory than windos. i had that with an 386 laptop years back. windos fine but no go with os/2, memory errors. i needed (under warranty) a new mainboard since a faulty dimm socket was causing the problem.
|
My Opinion Regarding an Linux Installation
Maybe Linux needs a switch (similar to Windows) to behave the same as Windows when installing and utilizing (and inspecting) memory. Linux/Mandriva/Ubuntu installations should be "easier" than Windows installations.
|
Dodgy RAM The Culprit
Just thought I'd share my experience with the kernel panic mentioned above. Tried switching the RAM around, but it was still causing problems.
It turned out to be a dodgy stick of RAM. Pulled one of the sticks out and the system worked fine. Come to think of it this explains a lot! I guess I'll buy a couple of 2GB sticks (good quality- not the cheap- and different- stuff I've got now) and be done with it. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 PM. |