Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
06-19-2016, 01:31 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2016
Distribution: any&all, in VBox; Ol'UnixCLI; NO GUI resources
Posts: 999
|
iso;-) SMALLEST linux that uses latest systemd/kernel, for hobby study of booting!
I run VirtualBox on an OLD Asus eeePC 1000HA 2G Atom N270.
My focus is on just booting to command-line shell (w/net)
but latest kernel (boot options=parameters=commands)
and a distro that runs systemd! I like the size of TinyCore
but it doesn't have systemd.
|
|
|
06-19-2016, 03:46 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
|
if that was a question for which distro will suit your needs, i say archlinux.
command line only (if that's waht you want), uses systemd & latest kernel.
start here.
welcome to LQ, by the way!
|
|
|
06-19-2016, 11:00 AM
|
#3
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: PCLinuxOS, Salix
Posts: 6,227
|
Arch is also a bother to set up. I've just looked at Distrowatch and a good choice would seem to be Manjaro Net-edition (an Arch derivative).
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
06-24-2016, 05:32 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2016
Distribution: any&all, in VBox; Ol'UnixCLI; NO GUI resources
Posts: 999
Original Poster
|
I got manjaro-net 628mb .iso but I can't get to the grub boot options (holding shift [nor tab] didn't help).
It does offer a "Boot options" line, but seems to ignore what I enter. (I can use F3 to choose text only)
My goal/intent is to enter: nomce blacklist i2c_piix4 vga=769 single
and remove quiet. I can see the "Kernel command line" via dmesg.
Also, what happened to urpmi? Can I use apt instead of pacman?
Thanks!!!
Last edited by Jjanel; 06-24-2016 at 05:44 AM.
|
|
|
06-24-2016, 06:42 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0 Multilib
Posts: 6,564
|
LFS-systemd is probably one of the smallest when stripped accordingly. You will have to build it yourself.
|
|
|
06-24-2016, 02:59 PM
|
#6
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jjanel
what happened to urpmi? Can I use apt instead of pacman?
|
i don't know what urpmi is. rpm package management? in that case, same as for apt:
you could use apt if you completely re-engineered your manjaro install (it wouldn't be manjaro anymore), or you could just try to install apt and use it (alongside pacman?) until your system breaks.
but what would be the point?
if you really need that complete control over your system, i guess LFS is your only choice: build it from scratch.
|
|
|
06-24-2016, 03:10 PM
|
#7
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, EndeavourOS, OpenSUSE, KDE Neon
Posts: 4,028
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jjanel
I got manjaro-net 628mb .iso but I can't get to the grub boot options (holding shift [nor tab] didn't help).
It does offer a "Boot options" line, but seems to ignore what I enter. (I can use F3 to choose text only)
My goal/intent is to enter: nomce blacklist i2c_piix4 vga=769 single
and remove quiet. I can see the "Kernel command line" via dmesg.
Also, what happened to urpmi? Can I use apt instead of pacman?
Thanks!!!
|
Urpmi is used by Mageia & ROSA linux. Neither are particularly small by default, I believe Mageia can do a netinstall so might work for your needs if you used the developer edition of Mageia 6. Mageia 5 decidedly lacks in the most recent kernel. No idea about ROSA, never used it.
Apt is available on Debian derived distros. Debian does offer an excellent netinstall image, so it would fit your needs nicely if you enable backports (in order to get a current kernel).
Last edited by Timothy Miller; 06-24-2016 at 03:11 PM.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
06-25-2016, 03:33 AM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2016
Distribution: any&all, in VBox; Ol'UnixCLI; NO GUI resources
Posts: 999
Original Poster
|
Back to: I can't edit the grub boot options (holding shift [nor tab] didn't help).
It does offer a "Boot options" line; I tried 'quiet=0' (to over-ride 'quiet', which I thus can't delete), but that displays only a few msgs (tho I do see my quiet=0 via dmesg|grep command); modprobe.blacklist=i2c_piix4 does work. Also vga=786 (cuz netbook's WHOLE screen is x600)
Maybe Manjaro [latest -net; the **.iso**, NOT an *installed* manjaro which DOES use grub2]
doesn't use GRUB [?] (it seems to use isolinux under /bootmnt)
https://forum.manjaro.org/t/booting-...g-grub2/3132/2
LFS is a great idea, but my current focus/resources is too minimal to build...
Maybe even systemd [or rc*] is beyond what I initially want, at the moment:
just grub2 -> init=/bin/sh [that made boot hang;-( but 'single' does the trick!]
i.e.: minimum pkgs! (just N<tab><enter> got my network up! +dbus.service)
TIA again!
Last edited by Jjanel; 06-26-2016 at 12:43 PM.
|
|
|
06-25-2016, 12:05 PM
|
#9
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
|
i just want to recap, you are having this problem in a virtualbox vm running on a linux install on an eeepc netbook?
so the barebones install is ok, and you're trying to install manjaro inside a vm?
|
|
|
06-26-2016, 01:13 AM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2016
Distribution: any&all, in VBox; Ol'UnixCLI; NO GUI resources
Posts: 999
Original Poster
|
Sorry, I kinda ramble in many directions...
No, my old eeePC 1000HA has XP (sp2). I use it for Firefox (web browsing).
My goal/interest is: to study (as a hobby) BOOTING (to *JUST* a shell)
various Linux distros (esp. widely-used/current ones)
using the minimal (=no-cost) old hardware I already have. And slow internet, so small!
Each is like opening a gift ;-) And each glitch is like a fun puzzle! Learning heaven.
I like understanding each intricacy in-depth.
I'm already familiar with user-level Unix, & not "into" apps/GUIs.
I'm intrigued by http://kernel.org/doc/Documentation/...parameters.txt
Next focus for me is probably grub, then systemd.
I've enjoyed downloading .iso's (a few of the hundred+ distros available)
and easily booting (in VirtualBox), to just a shell, to look around.
|
|
|
07-11-2016, 02:02 PM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2015
Distribution: Debian, SUSE, NXOS
Posts: 242
Rep:
|
I personally have a distaste for systemd as it is pretty much the polar opposite of the unix-like philosophy, and there is also a security problem that has been pointed out to me regarding it's behaviour.
Network service crashes under attack, systemd restarts it everytime, leaving your linux-box vulnerable to an infinite amount of attacks. This is why service crashes should trigger alerts that email/msg you to take a look, and FIX IT! Not blindly restart it endlessly....
Just passing on good info!
biosboy4
|
|
|
07-13-2016, 04:44 PM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2016
Distribution: any&all, in VBox; Ol'UnixCLI; NO GUI resources
Posts: 999
Original Poster
|
ok, no systemd... (dream of a custom-gift 'bin-LFS'?)
yea, looks like systemd is aiming to be as complex as the WHOLE kernel, lol!
My desire came from a dream of RHCE [make that "nightmare"  ]
Ok, how about this instead: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...31#post5575531
Last edited by Jjanel; 07-13-2016 at 04:51 PM.
|
|
|
10-24-2016, 08:49 PM
|
#13
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: Texas
Distribution: LFS 9.0 Custom, Merged Usr, Linux 4.19.x
Posts: 616
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jjanel
|
If you want to study systems development in earnest (you mentioned booting), you're on the wrong site. The Linux community spends as much time invested in politics and ideology as they do hacking(coding).
If you're interested in OS from a more academic perspective, try the site below. You'll find how-to's for things like rolling your own bootloader and explanations of how kernels actually work there.
http://wiki.osdev.org/Main_Page
Last edited by Luridis; 10-24-2016 at 08:51 PM.
|
|
2 members found this post helpful.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|