LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-01-2005, 05:24 AM   #1
lumba
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: redhat9
Posts: 53

Rep: Reputation: 15
Is Linux Really Stable?


Hi:

I have started using Linux because I needed to run an application that's based on Linux. I changed several distributions: Redhat, Fedora, and Mandrake. I didn't like Redhat, Fedora had sound problems stability, and Mandrake had networking problems.
I am looking for a distribution that' has a stability reputation if there's any.

I appreciate any recommendation.

Chawki
 
Old 06-01-2005, 05:31 AM   #2
oneandoneis2
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: London, England
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 1,460

Rep: Reputation: 48
Slackware is probably the distro with the best reputation for stability.
 
Old 06-01-2005, 05:32 AM   #3
ray alex
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Distribution: Fedora 3
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
Stability ?

Stability or easy handling?

If you don't know ?

Try the knoppix live cd. Cant be more simple then that !

http://www.knoppix.org/
 
Old 06-01-2005, 07:14 AM   #4
lumba
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: redhat9
Posts: 53

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Re: Stability ?

[QUOTE]Originally posted by ray alex
[B]Stability or easy handling?

stability
 
Old 06-01-2005, 07:53 AM   #5
reddazz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 76
Maybe you should take a look at Debian if you are concerned about stability.
 
Old 06-01-2005, 08:13 AM   #6
cs-cam
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,544
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 57
For rock-solid-i-dare-you-to-try-and-break-me stability, I'd recommend first a BSD, then Slackware. Maybe Debian but I've never actually used it so I won't comment, I've only heard it good but I've heard some horror stories too so take that as you will...

On a different approach, both Redhat and Mandrake are pretty decent distrobutions, did you try working out your problems with those? Can't have been too serious I'd imagine since every linux distrobution uses various versions of the same kernel so if you've managed to install some obscure sound card/network interface in your computer that the kernel doesn't support you won't make it work whichever distro you use.
 
Old 06-01-2005, 09:31 AM   #7
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 257Reputation: 257Reputation: 257
Moved: More suitable in our Distributions forum where this is asked literally daily.

And who said Linux was stable.. they've been lying just to get you to use it..
 
Old 06-01-2005, 09:34 AM   #8
KimVette
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Lee, NH
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS, RHEL
Posts: 1,794

Rep: Reputation: 46
Linux can be very stable. If you pick an odd-numbered kernel or a distribution like Fedora you should expect instability since odd-numbered kernels are officially unstable (development branch) and Fedora is officially an unstable development distribution.

Actually that is why I hate RedHat. It used to be my distribution of choice, then they abandoned the market that put them on the map (the desktop market) and their only desktop offering is a distribution which is known to be unstable, is officially unstable, and is unsupported.

Slackware, Suse, Mandriva, etc. are all rock-solid out of the box. The only real software-related stability problems that come up with Linux are when you run flaky hardware (e.g., Abit motherboards ), new chipsets with weak support, or start patching the kernel with crap patches like that which is required for ATI's lousy Catalyst driver package.
 
Old 06-01-2005, 10:21 AM   #9
heema
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Egypt
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,528

Rep: Reputation: 47
check out slackware or debian
 
Old 06-03-2005, 03:12 PM   #10
jollyjoice
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo 64
Posts: 383

Rep: Reputation: 30
i have NEVER had my gentoo system fall over on me, apps yes, kde yes, X yes. the kernel, no, i have always got it back on its feet.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
most stable linux jonnyhashem General 19 08-01-2005 08:41 PM
how can i upgrade my squid 2.5 stable 1 to stable 3 in RH9? debloxie Linux - Networking 0 05-12-2004 09:49 PM
how can i upgrade my squid 2.5 stable 1 to stable 3 in RH9? debloxie Linux - Networking 0 05-12-2004 12:25 PM
Linux, Stable? johnleemk Linux - General 15 12-27-2003 02:09 AM
Installing KDE3.1.3 on stable system using the "stable" mirror at download.kde.org preben Debian 8 08-28-2003 08:02 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:45 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration