Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
07-12-2014, 04:53 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2011
Posts: 178
Rep: 
|
High security and privacy OS's that can be installed to hard disk
Greetings,
I have been reviewing various different security and privacy oriented Linux and BSD distros. It seems like the most secure and private distros that I have seen thus far (Liberte and Tails) you can't even install to hard drive but must use them as a "live cd" only. I am needing an OS with this level of security and privacy features yet can be installed to a hard disk. Any suggestions?
Thanks
|
|
|
07-12-2014, 05:18 PM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
|
That Liberte and Tails can't be installed to HD is part of their security concept. You can't alter read-only media like CDs and DVDs, so it is impossible install a rootkit or replace binaries with compromised versions. Installing them to a harddisk makes them less secure, so it is not intended.
Anyways, any Linux distribution/BSD (with some exclusions, like Puppy) can be set up to be secure and have options for increased privacy. OpenBSD is known for its main focus being security, so I would start with that.
|
|
|
07-12-2014, 07:49 PM
|
#3
|
Moderator
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,361
|
You can install any live cd to a hard drive but it may still act like a live cd. For example LPS can be put on a usb or hard drive but the squash file is not writable.
Distro's are not secure. Some of the BSD's make some pretty good claims (maybe well worth it) but that is OS only. When you start adding in apps you get more and more holes with each app.
Last edited by jefro; 07-12-2014 at 07:51 PM.
|
|
|
07-13-2014, 04:02 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0 Multilib
Posts: 6,567
|
If you want a more secure installable OS, you should look into OpenBSD and Hardened Gentoo.
They're not 100% perfect, in fact, no system is 100% including LiveDisks, but they represent efforts to focus more on security and stability than pumping out packages. Just about any distribution that focuses on stability and has a good security handling policy of issuing updates as required for security can be fairly effective.
However even then, any system can be fairly secure if you have a well made security policy that is tested, has proper security clearance levels for users, locks down certain services and ports, utilizes jails and control groups to limit resources and sandbox problematics, and other things.
|
|
|
07-13-2014, 04:53 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Muse
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: A2 area Mi.
Posts: 17,700
|
ALL os's are secure or INSECURE
it depends on how one sets it up
I would use CentOS 6.5 with full disk encryption
keep SE set to enforcing and targeted
uninstall unneeded services and programs
lock up firefox ( look into Tor-bundle)
|
|
|
07-13-2014, 08:12 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2011
Posts: 178
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD
Anyways, any Linux distribution/BSD (with some exclusions, like Puppy) can be set up to be secure and have options for increased privacy.
|
Hmm, why can't Puppy Linux be made secure?
|
|
|
07-13-2014, 08:30 PM
|
#7
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
|
Puppy is a single user system by design, you are always root.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|