Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
This can start a very long thread. I believe both are very good and probably both have equal amounts of pros and cons with them. I tend to find myself booting into GNOME more often. Even though I like KDE 2. Here is what most people would respond to with that type of question:
Try them both out and use the one you prefer.
Most of the time if I need to use a KDE app, I just load it in GNOME as I boot into it more often. Maybe because its my default. Maybe I should change that and if I changed my default to KDE, it would be an opposite, I would boot into KDE more often.
Best thing to do is try them both out, install them both. Visit both websites and do some comparisons there on them. This is really a opinion type question and your going to get different responses from everyone. But me, I tend to use whatever really. But that is just me.
Well I use KDE, but that's mostly bekause it was inkluded as the default window manager in SuSE. KDE is nice and the Konqueror browser is coming along nicely. IIRC gnome is the default window manager for RH. It's gnice from what I've gnoticed but you gneed to get used to the gnomenclature.
KDE, no Gnome, no KDE, noooooo Gnome, no no no KDE.......uhhhh not really sure.......
Gnome used to be the most Linux pure desktop, with KDE using QT which wasn't fully under the GPL (I think!), but now they are both as good as each other.
You can customise GNOME more easily (I do like using it with Sawfish), but KDE is more stable IME. The new GNOME file manager Nautilus is complete bloat-ware, and totally slowed down my system. It's a good job you can uninstall it and using gmc as the desktop manager.
I've just ordered SuSE 7.2 which I hear gives you quite a big nudge towards KDE, but I'll probably install both so I can run GNOME and KDE apps.
I like KDE alot. ALthough GNOME is the GNU desktop, I just like KDE more. KDE is more cheery. But, sometimes I like the 'slick' feel of GNOME. I usually use KDE because, in my opinion, it's much easier to use. I also like the icons in it.
Distribution: Debian Sarge (2.6.9-albooksleep) on a PPC
Posts: 64
Rep:
when u get down to it, it's basically a matter of which you think looks better. i don't think either one really does any function better than the other. it's just a matter of looks and interface.
Originally posted by Tasha v71 hey, i work at Target, ya know the store... and we sell a pair of shoes that are called Vivek.... they're butt ass ugly too
i'm with KDE for the moment... coz i like its look and feel as well as the fact that it does seem a lot more stable than Gnome (i've uninstalled gome from my box)...
I always find it strange how it seems that the more high level, and technical someone is, the worse their computer, and the more low level the programs they tend to use are.
I've used the top of the range programs for VLSI chip design, and they really are the most obtusely made programs i've ever seen. Ugly, cumbersome, but ppl in that deep seem to prefer the lower spec every time...
BUT who in their right mind seriously can use twm without exploding in frustration, getting that stupid grid up every time they want to load a program etc.. ewwww.
to re-iterate (and in line with the spirit of linux...) it's all about the personal freedom of choice. try it, keep what you like, discard the rest... works for me (unless i don't really know what i'm discarding and then i'm heading for the 'hitting myself on the head with a spade' therapy)
agreed on twm though... but then again, i've always considered myself some class of doofus...(check again my therapy)
__________________________________
Windows is, by far the most used operating system in the world
with more than 150 million installations worldwide. Linux fans, on the
other hand, may note that cockroaches are far more numerous than
humans and that numbers alone do not denote a higher life form.
i have both installed... i have gnome running on my user account and kde running on my root. i definitely prefer the gnome tho. i'm testing out kde2 - it looks pretty good.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.